Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old October 20th 07, 02:39 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2007
Posts: 14
Default 80m Vertical info

Old timer here, (VK5JE) wanting to get back into HF. Would really appreciate
pointers to web based info on build it yourself 80m vertical or dipole. Have
somewhat limited real estate!

JERD


  #2   Report Post  
Old October 20th 07, 07:11 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2007
Posts: 76
Default 80m Vertical info

"JERD" wrote in message
...
Old timer here, (VK5JE) wanting to get back into HF. Would really
appreciate pointers to web based info on build it yourself 80m vertical or
dipole. Have somewhat limited real estate!

JERD


A9KW has various desgn and ideas, that he builds
http://www.zerofive-antennas.com/

gb


  #3   Report Post  
Old October 21st 07, 06:21 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,324
Default 80m Vertical info

On Oct 20, 2:11 pm, "gb" wrote:
"JERD" wrote in message

...

Old timer here, (VK5JE) wanting to get back into HF. Would really
appreciate pointers to web based info on build it yourself 80m vertical or
dipole. Have somewhat limited real estate!


JERD


A9KW has various desgn and ideas, that he buildshttp://www.zerofive-antennas.com/

gb


Occasionally I'll listen to the online receiver made available by
K2JEU (http://www.ralabs.com/webradio/). Over the years he has used
various diffent antennas, ranging from longwires, to beams to most
recently a roughly 75 ft sloper. However, at one point he was using
40+ vertical from zerofive and it was vastly superior to every other
antenna I've see him use (excepting the beam, which doesn't belong in
the same comparison class). I almost couldn't believe it. I'd have
expected a large vertical to be pretty noisy, but the zerofive antenna
was incredibly quiet. I don't have space for such an antenna myself,
but I was awfully impressed with this one. It was really something.

Steve
KC2SIZ


  #4   Report Post  
Old October 22nd 07, 12:03 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,374
Default 80m Vertical info

Steve wrote:

Occasionally I'll listen to the online receiver made available by
K2JEU (http://www.ralabs.com/webradio/). Over the years he has used
various diffent antennas, ranging from longwires, to beams to most
recently a roughly 75 ft sloper. However, at one point he was using
40+ vertical from zerofive and it was vastly superior to every other
antenna I've see him use (excepting the beam, which doesn't belong in
the same comparison class). I almost couldn't believe it. I'd have
expected a large vertical to be pretty noisy, but the zerofive antenna
was incredibly quiet. I don't have space for such an antenna myself,
but I was awfully impressed with this one. It was really something.


Quietness isn't usually a good attribute of a receiving antenna. A dummy
load is, after all, extremely quiet. Or do you mean that it had some
magical property of separating the signal you wanted to listen to from
all the others?

Roy Lewallen, W7EL
  #5   Report Post  
Old October 22nd 07, 02:46 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,324
Default 80m Vertical info

On Oct 21, 7:03 pm, Roy Lewallen wrote:
Steve wrote:

Occasionally I'll listen to the online receiver made available by
K2JEU (http://www.ralabs.com/webradio/). Over the years he has used
various diffent antennas, ranging from longwires, to beams to most
recently a roughly 75 ft sloper. However, at one point he was using
40+ vertical from zerofive and it was vastly superior to every other
antenna I've see him use (excepting the beam, which doesn't belong in
the same comparison class). I almost couldn't believe it. I'd have
expected a large vertical to be pretty noisy, but the zerofive antenna
was incredibly quiet. I don't have space for such an antenna myself,
but I was awfully impressed with this one. It was really something.


Quietness isn't usually a good attribute of a receiving antenna. A dummy
load is, after all, extremely quiet. Or do you mean that it had some
magical property of separating the signal you wanted to listen to from
all the others?

Roy Lewallen, W7EL


I doubt that it was a magical property, but it delivered more signal
and less noise than the other antennas he's used (at least while I've
been visiting his site). Hard to say what would explain it as many of
the details (grounds, radials, etc.) of his setup aren't set forth on
his website.

Steve
KC2SIZ

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
INFO WANTED on Vertical Dipole Antannas Bill Hansen Shortwave 2 February 26th 04 08:17 AM
Vertical Dipole Antenna INFO WANTED Bill Hansen Scanner 9 February 25th 04 08:42 AM
INFO WANTED on Vertical Dipole Antennas Bill Hansen General 0 February 22nd 04 11:10 PM
INFO WANTED on Vertical Dipole Antennas Bill Hansen Antenna 0 February 22nd 04 11:08 PM
Info on Cushcraft R3 triband vertical Jim Coffey Antenna 2 August 29th 03 10:29 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:25 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017