| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
|
Cecil Moore wrote:
Mark Keith wrote: Actually, I have tried it on 10m and most other bands. "I do have 80m dipoles". But no, the dipole never beat the 5/8 GP. Fed with coax, and no doubt, laying on the ground. Yep, fed with coax, but being the mismatch wasn't that large in the real world, the loss shouldn't have been overly bad. Actually, I think it was nearly resonant. or under 3:1 anyway...The antenna was at 36 ft. Hardly on the ground. It's like when I was out camping using a ladder line fed 80m, 130 ft dipole. I tried it on ten. It was pathetic due to the overly high takeoff angles. I'm talking terrible. Perhaps, you had a cold solder joint (maybe on purpose so you could report what you are reporting?) Your results just don't make sense. Worked fine on 80 and 40. My results make sense to me. But I'm a flat earther. Well, unless I'm high up in a jet. Then I can tell it slightly curves a bit. But when I'm on the ground, the earth does seem fairly flat. So it must be...MK -- http://web.wt.net/~nm5k |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Want K2BT "Ham Radio" articles on phasing verticals | Antenna | |||
| 40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||