LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #23   Report Post  
Old February 21st 04, 12:48 AM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Mark Keith wrote:
Yep, fed with coax, but being the mismatch wasn't that large in the real
world, the loss shouldn't have been overly bad.


Egads, that is the whole problem. The mismatch was terrible.

It's like when I was out camping using a ladder line fed 80m, 130 ft
dipole. I tried it on ten. It was pathetic due to the overly high takeoff
angles.


Absolutely false! The TOA of a 130 ft. dipole on 10m is about 10 degrees.
MOM+physics, not your feelings, dictate that fact.

But when I'm on the ground, the earth does seem fairly
flat. So it must be...MK


Yep, that's what the Catholic priests told Galileo so it must be true.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 11:22 PM
Want K2BT "Ham Radio" articles on phasing verticals DOUGLAS SNOWDEN Antenna 1 February 17th 04 02:43 AM
40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet Dick Antenna 2 February 6th 04 09:55 PM
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 12 October 16th 03 08:44 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:26 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017