| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
|
Mark Keith wrote:
Yep, fed with coax, but being the mismatch wasn't that large in the real world, the loss shouldn't have been overly bad. Egads, that is the whole problem. The mismatch was terrible. It's like when I was out camping using a ladder line fed 80m, 130 ft dipole. I tried it on ten. It was pathetic due to the overly high takeoff angles. Absolutely false! The TOA of a 130 ft. dipole on 10m is about 10 degrees. MOM+physics, not your feelings, dictate that fact. But when I'm on the ground, the earth does seem fairly flat. So it must be...MK Yep, that's what the Catholic priests told Galileo so it must be true. -- 73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Want K2BT "Ham Radio" articles on phasing verticals | Antenna | |||
| 40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet | Antenna | |||
| QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||