Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore wrote:
Tom Donaly wrote: What is the characteristic impedance of Tom's coil? A few thousand ohms. Use equation 50 at: http://www.ttr.com/TELSIKS2001-MASTER-1.pdf What's your formula for the velocity factor of Tom's coil? Is it from the same Tesla coil crackpot you quoted in previous posts? Do you reject all IEEE white papers? The formula is equation 32. Cecil, Have you actually read and understood that article? Corum mentions several times that everything he reduces to the simple formulas applies only to quarter-wave resonance conditions. Look at the author's highlight between equations 31 and 32. Look at the discussion near equation 47. Look at the discussion following equation 60. Read the entire discussion in section 5. Note that he does not say the characteristic impedance is a constant that can be deduced from resonance conditions and then applied to operating conditions. In fact, he says exactly the opposite. "It is worth noting that, for a helical anisotropic wave guide, the effective characteristic impedance is not merely a function of the geometrical configuration of the conductors (as it would be for lossless TEM coaxial cables and twin-lead transmission lines), but it is also a function of the excitation frequency." I have no comment on the validity of the Corum analysis. He makes a lot of approximations and simplifications which may or may not be completely correct. However, it is clear that you are mis-quoting him. 73, Gene W4SZ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|