Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Cecil Moore wrote: Jim Kelley wrote: We apparently each have our own approach for trying to quash the spewing of claptrap science on r.r.a.a. I wish you better luck with yours than I've had with mine. Reflected EM waves existing without energy is one of the bigger claptrap science concepts on this newsgroup. For the record, you're the only one who has ever made any reference waves existing without energy on this newsgroup. I doubt that you will understand it any better this time, but for the authoritative explanation of the concept (which you have always totally misconstrued), please refer to page 47 of Born and Wolf, 6th Edition. Under the heading "Total Reflection" you will find the following: "All the incident light is then reflected back into the first medium and we speak of total reflection. Nevertheless the electromagnetic field in the second medium does not disappear, only there is not longer a flow of energy across the boundary." 73, ac6xg |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Guy from university physics dept. makes claims to incite/provokeamateurs! | Antenna | |||
the 'language' of physics GOSPELS FAR FROM THE TRUTH --Mor... | Shortwave | |||
Physics according to toad | Policy | |||
NY TIMES says new super-small Hammie Antenna defies physics | CB | |||
Ye canna change the lars o' physics | CB |