| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gene Fuller wrote:
Therefore, your proof that my "Incorrect" assertion is incorrect is itself incorrect. Please answer the question. It is known that Re(ExH*)/2 = 0 for pure standing waves all up and down the line. If E and H* are both non-zero, how can Re(ExH*)/2 be zero? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Hurricane Warning | Shortwave | |||
| A warning! | Antenna | |||
| WARNING ON COMMCO. | Swap | |||
| WARNING ABOUT COMMCORADIO | Swap | |||
| a warning from the CAPTAIN | Shortwave | |||