Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Gene Fuller wrote:
Therefore, your proof that my "Incorrect" assertion is incorrect is itself incorrect. Please answer the question. It is known that Re(ExH*)/2 = 0 for pure standing waves all up and down the line. If E and H* are both non-zero, how can Re(ExH*)/2 be zero? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hurricane Warning | Shortwave | |||
A warning! | Antenna | |||
WARNING ON COMMCO. | Swap | |||
WARNING ABOUT COMMCORADIO | Swap | |||
a warning from the CAPTAIN | Shortwave |