Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 21 Jan, 15:10, art wrote:
On 21 Jan, 14:55, John Smith wrote: art wrote: ... So you reject the magnetic field shape of a diamagnetic material being deifferent from its steel counterpart? I have heavy military 12 ft. SS whips, a magnet will stick to them ... Regards, JS Then it is not fully efficient as a diamagnetic material. You will note that the SS retains energy in its magnetic condition via a hysteresis curve. Art Let me qualify my remarks a bit more. Diamagnetic materials produce an oxide on its surface which controls the magnetic field but without retention of energy. Stainless steel has chromium and nickel as part of its contents which also produce an oxide on its surfaces. I would imagine that the configuration of the magnetic field would be somewhat different and the iron content would also retain magnetic energy instead of using it for radiation. Art |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Hurricane Warning | Shortwave | |||
A warning! | Antenna | |||
WARNING ON COMMCO. | Swap | |||
WARNING ABOUT COMMCORADIO | Swap | |||
a warning from the CAPTAIN | Shortwave |