Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() So, to reduce any future "anticipation," is the remote site bonded to the service ground of your home? Let me rephrase my situation. New house near completion. My shack will be at the far corner from the power service entrance. I was thinking of just putting a couple ground rods ( bonded together ) just outside my ham shack and letting them be my equipment chassis ground, probably through a #6 wire from shack to ground rods. My intent was primarily for DC safety, plus a little 'static' dissipation. As pointed out by one of you guys, I should meet NEC code, which would mandate my bonding this separate ground I would install with the house service entrance ground. My problem with that is that it would require a run of cable from the ground rods at least 100 feet to get down and around the house to the service entrance. This is not really practical nor desirable on my part. While I understand the potential for ground loops, I deem it a rather small likelyhood in relation to the static dissipation benefit I'd get with the closer separate ground I could install. Others here seem to disagree with me, so I closed my previous post with the comment that perhaps I'd be better off forgetting my shack ground and just let the equipment be grounded through the individual power cords to the outlet ground. Now that I may have cleared my situation up, what do you guys think? Ed K7AAT PS: Richard, just missing a view of the Pacific... about a half of a mile away ... and I may reconsider a vertical antenna instead of the dipole I was going to use. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
grounding | Antenna | |||
Showdown in the Sand. | Shortwave | |||
Grounding | Shortwave | |||
grounding | Antenna |