Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 10 Mar 2008 14:07:56 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote: Richard Clark wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: Actually, I am using ohm's law instead of string theory. To respond to the topic of Coherence.... Neither shocking nor a surprise as it's as though I were reading the last pages of "Flowers for Algernon." If Mr. Ohm introduced his law today, he would be belittled because it is not a theory of everything. Your response is worthy of Charly. Ohm's Law doesn't work at all scales anyway - but Ohm would have been resilient enough to have taken it where it needs to go in this day and age. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sad Story | Policy | |||
(OT) Story of the Day 1 | Shortwave | |||
Top Story | Shortwave | |||
The whole story... | CB | |||
The Whole Story | CB |