Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #41   Report Post  
Old March 18th 08, 08:18 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,374
Default Incoming radio wave polarisation

Sorry, of course you're right. Thanks for the correction. I apologize
for the (repeated) error.

Roy

Owen Duffy wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote in
:

....
actually overshoots 276 ohms. Then, after reaching its peak, it
monotonically approaches 276 ohms from the high side as you get


120*pi or 377?

Owen

  #42   Report Post  
Old March 18th 08, 08:35 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 588
Default Incoming radio wave polarisation

Examination of the radiation patterns of horizontal HF antennas
(Dipoles, horizontal rhombics, etc.) near the earth confirms that they
invariably have zero response at zero elevation on their best azimuths.
(Should have made it clear that the antennas were near the earth, not
just their patterns.)

The earth reflects energy which strikes it at a grazing incidence
inverting the phase on reflection. The incident and reflected HF
horizontally polarized waves add to zero producing a null along the
earth`s surface.

I did not include enough detail in my earlier posting so Richard Fry
replied:
"If this were true (zero response at zero elevation on their best
azimuths) then most television stations would have zero field strength
near the earth over much of their present coverage areas."

If TV station antennas were 1/2-wavelength or less above the earth,
their field strengths near the earth would truly be near zero over much
of their present coverage areas, VHF, or UHF.

Best regards, Richard Harrison, KB5WZI

Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Problems with ARRL Incoming buro? Dave WB4IUY Dx 12 December 1st 06 08:48 AM
Incoming signal elevation question Ken Bessler Antenna 19 May 26th 06 03:48 AM
ARRL's Incoming QSL Burro! NIW Policy 1 March 25th 04 11:52 AM
ARRL's Incoming QSL Burro! NIW General 3 March 24th 04 11:38 AM
Incoming radiation angles Art Unwin KB9MZ Antenna 33 January 5th 04 11:11 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:08 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017