Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yes it is. Just looked at the box and it says MFJ-259Z but the front of
meter says MFJ-259B. I don't understand this at all. "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Barrett wrote: The jumper is on in the unit and all the batteries are in there correct position. The link for the MFJ-259Z on the W&S site is http://www.wsplc.com/cgi-bin/ss00000...=14&ACTION.y=3 Is this an MFJ product? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Barrett" wrote in message ... Yes it is. Just looked at the box and it says MFJ-259Z but the front of meter says MFJ-259B. I don't understand this at all. "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Barrett wrote: The jumper is on in the unit and all the batteries are in there correct position. The link for the MFJ-259Z on the W&S site is http://www.wsplc.com/cgi-bin/ss00000...=14&ACTION.y=3 Is this an MFJ product? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com A quick Google search shows a few sales outlets, but the MFJ company didn't show up when searching MFJ-259Z. I suspect an after market modification by someone. This site has a letter from someone else having a charging problem with the MFL-259Z. See the second letter. http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/13 Mike |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I borrowed some 1800mA and these are charging fine in the MFJ-259, so it
looks like the problem is with the batteries. I have never experienced this with these type of batteries before only NiCad's. "amdx" wrote in message ... "Barrett" wrote in message ... Yes it is. Just looked at the box and it says MFJ-259Z but the front of meter says MFJ-259B. I don't understand this at all. "Cecil Moore" wrote in message ... Barrett wrote: The jumper is on in the unit and all the batteries are in there correct position. The link for the MFJ-259Z on the W&S site is http://www.wsplc.com/cgi-bin/ss00000...=14&ACTION.y=3 Is this an MFJ product? -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com A quick Google search shows a few sales outlets, but the MFJ company didn't show up when searching MFJ-259Z. I suspect an after market modification by someone. This site has a letter from someone else having a charging problem with the MFL-259Z. See the second letter. http://www.eham.net/reviews/detail/13 Mike |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I borrowed some 1800mA and these are charging fine in the MFJ-259, so it
looks like the problem is with the batteries. I have never experienced this with these type of batteries before only NiCad's. What brand and type are the batteries that don't work? It's possible that you simply received a bunch of batteries that are completely defective (open) or are counterfeit dummies. Seems a bit implausible. Another possibilty is that the 2600 mAh cells are actually OK, but were delivered to you in a completely-run-down state. That seems plausible... the manufacturer may not have precharged them, or they may have self-discharged in storage after manufacture. The older type of NiMH cells do have a relatively high self-discharge rate, and can go flat after as little as three or four months of storage. If the batteries read 0 volts, then it's possible that a smart-charger might fail to detect their presence and start charging... I believe that some of the newer NiMH-aware charge-control ICs depend on the detection of _some_ voltage from the cell to detect the cell and start the charge. Try sticking a few of the cells into an old-style "dumb and slow" NiCd battery charger for a few hours. These are usually fixed-current chargers (100 mA or so) with no battery-detect or charge-cutoff circuits, so they're not a good choice for general use with NiMH cells. They _will_ feed some charge into the cells if the cells aren't entirely open, and should bring the cells up to 1.0 volts or better fairly quickly. After 2-3 hours, take the cells out of the dumb charger, check the open-circuit voltage, and put them in your smart-charger, and see if they are accepted and begin charging. If so, they may be OK. If not, they're probably defective or bogus and you may want to return them to the seller for a refund. Since an MFJ analyzer is the sort of device that tends to sit around unused for weeks at a time, I think that high-capacity high-self- discharge NiMH cells (e.g. most 2500 or above) are a poor choice. Unless you recharge for an hour or so once a week, you'll probably find them weak or dead when you want use the analyzer. High-capacity NiCd cells are the traditional choice for this sort of application (and are what I use in my own MFJ). Another possibility is the newer low-self-discharge NiMH cells, such as the Imedions, Eneloops, Hybrios, and Hybrids. These are typically 2000-2100 mAh, and will hold the majority of their charge for a year or more. If your MFJ has been modified to charge NiMH properly (e.g. with a good temperature or zero-delta-V cutoff circuit) they might be a good choice. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Platt wrote:
High-capacity NiCd cells are the traditional choice for this sort of application I have been most happy with a small gelcell velcroed to my MJF-259B. -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Cecil Moore writes:
Dave Platt wrote: High-capacity NiCd cells are the traditional choice for this sort of application I have been most happy with a small gelcell velcroed to my MJF-259B. I've had mine for four years, and am still on my first set of disposable batteries. Just have to make sure it doesn't turn on accidentally under transport - I wrap some tape over one of the batteries. LA4RT Jon |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave, the batteries are called Supreme Power 2600mA standard charge 14-16 HRS x 260mA, quick charge 4-6 HRS x 550mA. REG USA Made in China.
I am waiting for a friend to bring by his old NiCad charger and I will give it ago. I will let you know how I got on. For future reference would you have an idea on how long I should charge the batteries for using the MFJ? I don't know who or how the charger circuit has been modified. I could ask W&S what sort of circuit has been used. "Dave Platt" wrote in message ... I borrowed some 1800mA and these are charging fine in the MFJ-259, so it looks like the problem is with the batteries. I have never experienced this with these type of batteries before only NiCad's. What brand and type are the batteries that don't work? It's possible that you simply received a bunch of batteries that are completely defective (open) or are counterfeit dummies. Seems a bit implausible. Another possibilty is that the 2600 mAh cells are actually OK, but were delivered to you in a completely-run-down state. That seems plausible... the manufacturer may not have precharged them, or they may have self-discharged in storage after manufacture. The older type of NiMH cells do have a relatively high self-discharge rate, and can go flat after as little as three or four months of storage. If the batteries read 0 volts, then it's possible that a smart-charger might fail to detect their presence and start charging... I believe that some of the newer NiMH-aware charge-control ICs depend on the detection of _some_ voltage from the cell to detect the cell and start the charge. Try sticking a few of the cells into an old-style "dumb and slow" NiCd battery charger for a few hours. These are usually fixed-current chargers (100 mA or so) with no battery-detect or charge-cutoff circuits, so they're not a good choice for general use with NiMH cells. They _will_ feed some charge into the cells if the cells aren't entirely open, and should bring the cells up to 1.0 volts or better fairly quickly. After 2-3 hours, take the cells out of the dumb charger, check the open-circuit voltage, and put them in your smart-charger, and see if they are accepted and begin charging. If so, they may be OK. If not, they're probably defective or bogus and you may want to return them to the seller for a refund. Since an MFJ analyzer is the sort of device that tends to sit around unused for weeks at a time, I think that high-capacity high-self- discharge NiMH cells (e.g. most 2500 or above) are a poor choice. Unless you recharge for an hour or so once a week, you'll probably find them weak or dead when you want use the analyzer. High-capacity NiCd cells are the traditional choice for this sort of application (and are what I use in my own MFJ). Another possibility is the newer low-self-discharge NiMH cells, such as the Imedions, Eneloops, Hybrios, and Hybrids. These are typically 2000-2100 mAh, and will hold the majority of their charge for a year or more. If your MFJ has been modified to charge NiMH properly (e.g. with a good temperature or zero-delta-V cutoff circuit) they might be a good choice. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave, the batteries are called Supreme Power 2600mA standard charge
14-16 HRS x 260mA, quick charge 4-6 HRS x 550mA. REG USA Made in China. Hmmm. I see various web sites offering that brand, but I don't see much in the way of comments about their quality (good or bad). I am waiting for a friend to bring by his old NiCad charger and I will give it ago. I will let you know how I got on. Please do - I'm curious. For future reference would you have an idea on how long I should charge the batteries for using the MFJ? Depends on the charger. In general, a fully-discharged NiMH cell will need to be "fed" somewhere around 150% of its rated capacity in order to reach full charge - some of the energy fed into it is dissipated as heat and doesn't go into rebuilding the electrochemistry. The "standard charge" recommendations you quoted are feeding the battery at a rate of .1C (10% of its capacity per hour) for 14-16 hours, so that's just about right. If you're using a different charger, you'd need to determine the amount of current being fed to each cell, divide that into the cell's rated capacity (to get the time required for 100% capacity delivery), and then add around 40-50%. These calculations apply *only* to cells which are fully discharged! If a cell is partially charged when you start to recharge it, it'll reach full charge sooner than these calculations indicate... and at that point the cell starts to heat up pretty rapidly. Most of the NiMH technology sheets I've read, seem to recommend charging these batteries at a relatively fast rate (no less than .2C, with .5C and 1C being common) and using a temperature sensor as the primary means of figuring out when to turn off the charge. Zero-delta-V is often used as a secondary method, with a timer being the final fallback. I don't know who or how the charger circuit has been modified. I could ask W&S what sort of circuit has been used. That would be a good idea! The 259/269 have a simple slow/trickle-charge circuit built in... it's OK for NiCd cells but isn't ideal for NiMH. It would be very interesting to know how this was modified for NiMH in the 259Z model. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Apr 2, 6:08*pm, (Dave Platt) wrote:
Dave, the batteries are called Supreme Power 2600mA standard charge 14-16 HRS x 260mA, quick charge 4-6 HRS x 550mA. REG USA Made in China. Hmmm. *I see various web sites offering that brand, but I don't see much in the way of comments about their quality (good or bad). I am waiting for a friend to bring by his old NiCad charger and I will give it ago. I will let you know how I got on. Please do - I'm curious. For future reference would you have an idea on how long I should charge the batteries for using the MFJ? Depends on the charger. *In general, a fully-discharged NiMH cell will need to be "fed" somewhere around 150% of its rated capacity in order to reach full charge - some of the energy fed into it is dissipated as heat and doesn't go into rebuilding the electrochemistry. *The "standard charge" recommendations you quoted are feeding the battery at a rate of .1C (10% of its capacity per hour) for 14-16 hours, so that's just about right. If you're using a different charger, you'd need to determine the amount of current being fed to each cell, divide that into the cell's rated capacity (to get the time required for 100% capacity delivery), and then add around 40-50%. These calculations apply *only* to cells which are fully discharged! If a cell is partially charged when you start to recharge it, it'll reach full charge sooner than these calculations indicate... and at that point the cell starts to heat up pretty rapidly. Most of the NiMH technology sheets I've read, seem to recommend charging these batteries at a relatively fast rate (no less than .2C, with .5C and 1C being common) and using a temperature sensor as the primary means of figuring out when to turn off the charge. Zero-delta-V is often used as a secondary method, with a timer being the final fallback. I don't know who or how the charger circuit has been modified. I could ask W&S what sort of circuit has been used. That would be a good idea! The 259/269 have a simple slow/trickle-charge circuit built in... it's OK for NiCd cells but isn't ideal for NiMH. *It would be very interesting to know how this was modified for NiMH in the 259Z model. -- Dave Platt * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: *http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior * I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will * * *boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! You may want to use the NiCd charger on them for a few minutes and then move them to the NiMH charger. Jimmie |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Barrett wrote:
Dave, the batteries are called Supreme Power 2600mA standard charge 14-16 HRS x 260mA, quick charge 4-6 HRS x 550mA. REG USA Made in China. I am waiting for a friend to bring by his old NiCad charger and I will give it ago. I will let you know how I got on. For future reference would you have an idea on how long I should charge the batteries for using the MFJ? I don't know who or how the charger circuit has been modified. I could ask W&S what sort of circuit has been used. "Dave Platt" wrote in message ... I borrowed some 1800mA and these are charging fine in the MFJ-259, so it looks like the problem is with the batteries. I have never experienced this with these type of batteries before only NiCad's. What brand and type are the batteries that don't work? It's possible that you simply received a bunch of batteries that are completely defective (open) or are counterfeit dummies. Seems a bit implausible. Another possibilty is that the 2600 mAh cells are actually OK, but were delivered to you in a completely-run-down state. That seems plausible... the manufacturer may not have precharged them, or they may have self-discharged in storage after manufacture. The older type of NiMH cells do have a relatively high self-discharge rate, and can go flat after as little as three or four months of storage. If the batteries read 0 volts, then it's possible that a smart-charger might fail to detect their presence and start charging... I believe that some of the newer NiMH-aware charge-control ICs depend on the detection of _some_ voltage from the cell to detect the cell and start the charge. Try sticking a few of the cells into an old-style "dumb and slow" NiCd battery charger for a few hours. These are usually fixed-current chargers (100 mA or so) with no battery-detect or charge-cutoff circuits, so they're not a good choice for general use with NiMH cells. They _will_ feed some charge into the cells if the cells aren't entirely open, and should bring the cells up to 1.0 volts or better fairly quickly. After 2-3 hours, take the cells out of the dumb charger, check the open-circuit voltage, and put them in your smart-charger, and see if they are accepted and begin charging. If so, they may be OK. If not, they're probably defective or bogus and you may want to return them to the seller for a refund. Since an MFJ analyzer is the sort of device that tends to sit around unused for weeks at a time, I think that high-capacity high-self- discharge NiMH cells (e.g. most 2500 or above) are a poor choice. Unless you recharge for an hour or so once a week, you'll probably find them weak or dead when you want use the analyzer. High-capacity NiCd cells are the traditional choice for this sort of application (and are what I use in my own MFJ). Another possibility is the newer low-self-discharge NiMH cells, such as the Imedions, Eneloops, Hybrios, and Hybrids. These are typically 2000-2100 mAh, and will hold the majority of their charge for a year or more. If your MFJ has been modified to charge NiMH properly (e.g. with a good temperature or zero-delta-V cutoff circuit) they might be a good choice. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! I've had the same set of NIMH 2100 maH Energizer cells in my 259B for over 3 years. I have had them on the internal charger 24x7, except when in use. I have had no trouble with the batteries overcharging with the internal charger in the 259B. (obviously, or I would have cooked them a long time ago). One thing I've learned about NIMH batteries...they don't sit well. They do wonderfully if kept trickle charged, but if let to sit, they will self-discharge in less than two weeks. (at least for digital camera purposes)I've observed this on three different "sets" of NIMH AA batteries. All act the same way. Two weeks of sitting and they will only operate the camera a very short time. Left in the charger and put directly into service I can shoot well over 75 pictures in a row with no difficulty. |