Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
I wonder what you consider narrow bandwidth. 500 KHz seems to be about par
for a decent 6 m beam. This antenna shows an SWR of 1.7 at 150 kHz below the resonant frequency, where the SWR is just 1, so I consider it narrow. Another antenna I have, also using an hairpin match but at 50 ohm instead of 200 ohm, is by far broader. On both antennas I have about 100 feet of low-loss 1/4" Andrew hardline, so the SWR is only slightly influenced by cable loss. Talking with the manfacturer, he told me that he preferred rasing the antenna impedance up to 200 ohm, instead than to 50 ohm, because a 4:1 cable balun can me more easily realized than a 1:1 balun. But doing so the feed system Q factor increases quite a lot, causing a significant bandwidth reduction. Moreover ohmic losses increase, due to the higher circulating currents (for a given RF power), but I am not able to predict whether such extra losses are significant or can be disregarded for all practical purposes. 73 Tony I0JX |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Efficiency of Vertical | Antenna | |||
Efficiency | Antenna | |||
Request for information on phase matching and set / batch matching | Antenna | |||
Yagi Hairpin Match | Antenna | |||
Building a Matching Transformer for Shortwave Listener's Antenna using a Binocular Ferrite Core from a TV type Matching Transformer | Shortwave |