Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#41
|
|||
|
|||
Sunspot cycle more dud than radiation flood
Alan Peake wrote: Cecil Moore wrote: M0WYM wrote: So you can't trust statistics - wow that's news. Can we trust the statistic that says the global-warming/ice-age cycle has repeated itself at 90K-150k year intervals for the last half million years? No. There are indications are that the cycles which correlate with ice ages, may not produce the conditions for another ice age for the next 60,000 years. Alan There are also indications that global temperature correlates inversely with the total number of pirates. The only actual correlation is of course that the respective numbers are plotted on a graph; one versus the other. A cause and effect relationship has not been demonstrated, but the "indications" might lead someone to assume there was one. ac6xg |
#42
|
|||
|
|||
Sunspot cycle more dud than radiation flood
"Jim Kelley" wrote in message ... Michael Coslo wrote: Buy Febreeze stock........ Proctor and Gamble closed at $65.27 today. It paid $0.40 a share last quarter. Hi Mike, speaking of things that are possible, it's possible that the hot air Al Gore produces has contributed more to global warming than anything else. Personally, I don't believe that. I think it's caused by the Sun. ac6xg ----------- Years ago I noticed a change in the color of the light being emitted by the Sun. I also noticed a difference in how it felt on my arm while driving the car. At the time I attributed the differences to my own personal aging. Lately I have begun to think that my first suspicions were correct. Something had changed in the nature of the solar output. This would also partially account for the melting of the polar ice caps on Mars. I find it odd that I haven't been able to find any confirming data from respectable scientific sources illustrating a change in solar output. Maybe I missed it? Ed, NM2K |
#43
|
|||
|
|||
Sunspot cycle more dud than radiation flood
"Ed Cregger" wrote in message ... "Jim Kelley" wrote in message ... Michael Coslo wrote: Buy Febreeze stock........ Proctor and Gamble closed at $65.27 today. It paid $0.40 a share last quarter. Hi Mike, speaking of things that are possible, it's possible that the hot air Al Gore produces has contributed more to global warming than anything else. Personally, I don't believe that. I think it's caused by the Sun. ac6xg ----------- Years ago I noticed a change in the color of the light being emitted by the Sun. I also noticed a difference in how it felt on my arm while driving the car. At the time I attributed the differences to my own personal aging. Lately I have begun to think that my first suspicions were correct. Something had changed in the nature of the solar output. This would also partially account for the melting of the polar ice caps on Mars. I find it odd that I haven't been able to find any confirming data from respectable scientific sources illustrating a change in solar output. Maybe I missed it? Ed, NM2K you can't trust mars, we have landed too many probes there now and they are obviously contributing to the warming. They are even measuring warming on Jupiter and we have only had one or two probes burn up there i think. |
#44
|
|||
|
|||
Sunspot cycle more dud than radiation flood
"Dave" wrote in message news:S9a0k.903$BV.460@trndny05... "Ed Cregger" wrote in message ... "Jim Kelley" wrote in message ... Michael Coslo wrote: Buy Febreeze stock........ Proctor and Gamble closed at $65.27 today. It paid $0.40 a share last quarter. Hi Mike, speaking of things that are possible, it's possible that the hot air Al Gore produces has contributed more to global warming than anything else. Personally, I don't believe that. I think it's caused by the Sun. ac6xg ----------- Years ago I noticed a change in the color of the light being emitted by the Sun. I also noticed a difference in how it felt on my arm while driving the car. At the time I attributed the differences to my own personal aging. Lately I have begun to think that my first suspicions were correct. Something had changed in the nature of the solar output. This would also partially account for the melting of the polar ice caps on Mars. I find it odd that I haven't been able to find any confirming data from respectable scientific sources illustrating a change in solar output. Maybe I missed it? Ed, NM2K you can't trust mars, we have landed too many probes there now and they are obviously contributing to the warming. They are even measuring warming on Jupiter and we have only had one or two probes burn up there i think. ---------- Damn! You're right. I hadn't thought of that possibility. Plus the Jupiter thing. After all, we nuked Junpiter. Ed, NM2K |
#45
|
|||
|
|||
Sunspot cycle more dud than radiation flood
I tuned into this thread to get the latest thinking about the sunspot
cycle and what did I find? A discussion of federal budgeting and welfare babies. Boy is this thread miss named! |
#46
|
|||
|
|||
Sunspot cycle more dud than radiation flood
Ed Cregger wrote: I find it odd that I haven't been able to find any confirming data from respectable scientific sources illustrating a change in solar output. I have trouble finding data that doesn't show changes in solar output. ac6xg |
#47
|
|||
|
|||
Sunspot cycle more dud than radiation flood
David J Windisch wrote:
Shucks, Ed, simply google ' change in solar output ' First listing: http://www.space.com/scienceastronom...ut_030320.html "In what could be the simplest explanation for one component of global warming, a new study shows the Sun's radiation has increased by .05 percent per decade since the late 1970s." -- 73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
First sunspot of cycle 24 spotted, gloom and doom perdicted :-) | Dx | |||
Sunspot Cycle 24 | Shortwave | |||
Sunspot cycle/Propagation - | Shortwave | |||
Sunspot cycle info please | Dx | |||
Sunspot cycle info please | Dx |