Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Rebuttal to Richard Clark's comments on my Chapter 19A
"Walter Maxwell" wrote in message ... Sorry if the posts offended you, Harold, but I'm flabbergasted that Richard had the gall to post his denigration of my paper in the newsgroup. With common sense he should have known to send his comments to me, not to broadcast them. I felt I had no choice but to put my rebuttal in the same place to defend myself from from his unwarrented comments. Walt, W2DU Walter, I can delete posts as well as the next guy, the point is, I shouldn't need to. You started the whole thing by giving Cecil the push. You, he, and several other off topic posters have just close to ruined a newsgroup that used to be a useful source of information concerning antennas. Then there's always the rebuttal to the rebuttal ad nausium. I know that you are as convinced as Bruene is of the sanctity of your convictions, you should realize, that the vast majority of the rest of us don't really care which of you are right. We've successfully managed to load our rigs, work the world, and obtain some happiness without the knowledge you insist on imparting to us. Please don't common sense Richard. With common sense, you wouldn't have sent 19A to Cecil in the first place but your ego got in the way. I'll not entertain the group with any more of this, I would hope that you take my earlier post to heart and get off the newsgroup unless you have something to post that contributes to the antenna sciences. W4ZCB |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
REBUTTAL TO RX-340 COMMENTS BY PHIL | Shortwave | |||
REBUTTAL TO COMMENTS ON RX-340 BY DAVE ZANTOW | Shortwave | |||
Richard Pryor | Shortwave | |||
Richard Pryor 6925 USB | Shortwave | |||
Richard S. Garner---Any one know--- | Swap |