On Jul 10, 5:51 pm, JIMMIE wrote:
Richard Clark wrote:
On Thu, 10 Jul 2008 09:05:56 -0400, "W3CQH"
wrote:

Double winding - in which direction and spaced how far apart in each
direction?

On Wed, 9 Jul 2008 19:11:52 -0700 (PDT), Art Unwin wrote:

Wind a close coil any diameter with it until half the wire is used
then change direction and come back
without changing wire winding direction and wind the wire on top of
the first coil where you finish with two wires to feed.
Put a variometer in series with it and then get on the air. Now this
is not exactly in equilibrium because one coil is a larger diameter
than
the other. Nor is the wire pre twisted pair which nullifies near field
noise to my thinking. Now you have a helix style antenna but without
the helix.
Coat the antenna with an alkyd type solution before you slide it off
the tube since the inside coil must be exposed the same way the
outside coil is exposed

Take one wavelength of zip cord. Wrap it around any diameter form, as
distinctly specified above by the authur. Half the wire is used
going, and half the wire is used returning by specification of the zip
cord, as distinctly specified above by the authur.

There is no change in winding direction as zip cord guarantees this by
physical attachment, as specified above by the authur. Both wires are
wrapped without changing direction, as distinctly specified above by
the author.

There is no pre twisting for the same reason (which might nullifie
near field noise to his thinking - an asset to almost anyone else, but
go figure), as specified above by the authur. It is exactly in
equilibrium because both coils are the same diameter, as distinctly
specified above by the authur.

There is no need for coating as there is no inside coil, this is
guaranteed by the physical construction of zip cord. Zip cord also
guarantees equal lengths of going/returning lengths of conductor.

Short one end of the zip cord paired conductors to make the gussian
loop, as distinctly specified above by the authur.

Feed the other end of the zip cord paired conductors to emit the
neutrons' weak force, as distinctly specified above by the authur.

Performance will follow the principal physics of this weak force and
provide an intensely weak signal. If your listeners experience
received signal levels greater than -40dB compared to a standard
(non-gussian) dipole, then you have not followed instructions
distinctly quoted above from the authur.

Careful attention to detail can achieve increased performances of up
to -60dB below traditional designs (indistinctly specified by the
authur).

Take care to note that this design is impossible to model as it
violates every software package's capacity to allow closely spaced
wires. There are absolutely no software products, nor freely
available packages that perform this analysis - you are now in faith
based alchemy. Any claims to the contrary (contradicting this faith
based illusion) are delusional. This level of delusion can be
confirmed by the whole absence of reference, citation, or offering of
results of double-blind testing.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

All other faults about Arts antenna ignored it is obvious he has not
considered the losses of the cable he is using to fabricate his
antenna. Zipcord is far from being a very good transmission line. I
have melted it while tuning a 75 watt transmitter into a light bulb.
The graphs on his website show pretty much what one would expect
feeding power into a very lossy cable. Yep it looks like he built
himself a very poor dummy load.

As a matter of fact I believe his discription of his wonder antenna
very closly describes a method of jury rigging an emergency dummy
load. The only thing else needed is a bucket of water.

Jimmie

My transmission line is Andrews..7/8 'dia. I dont use zip cord
You say the graphs depict a very lossy cable, can you give me a
reference that points to that?
Always willing to learn
And another point, where does this notion come from that a closed
circuit of one WL will always creat feed line radiation?
I have been of the opinion that with a balance to unbalanced jobby at
the antenna there is no radiation at all from the feed line and if you
use
open wire the jobby is not required. Another point where can a dummy
load be found with several resonant points and anti resonant points
with poor SWR in between? Another point what is the real capacitance
of zip cord per foot? Seems like somebody is not seeing that as a
lumped load ....curious.
Another point I can model two helix antennas, one LCP and one RCP
connected at one end and so could Kraus and so can the space
engineers!
The idea you cannot model close spaced lines when unlimited segments
are available seems to be inaccurate to me.
The idea thatr two helix antennas provide negative gain means somebody
is drinking.
Note the idea that radiation can some how be cancelled seems wrong to
me. I just can't see two particles with like magnetic fields
cancelling each other
Seem like a lot of wierd speculation is going on with nothing to
suggest that they are reasonable.