Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Richard Clark wrote:
On 28 Jul 2008 04:03:29 GMT, Ed wrote: About as well as it flows up the center conductor, possibly. You don't think that just because the cable is buried that RF flow on the shield conductor is prevented, do you? Hi Ed, I think Jonesy is fairly safe in his presumption. The classic work performed by Brown, Lewis, and Epstein pretty conclusively reported the nearly complete attenuation of direct driven RF currents in ground radials at 3MHz. 75 feet of buried shield would seem to be quite snubbed by the proximity of earth over much of the range of frequencies reliably operated from a multi-band HF vertical. Of course, adding a choke can't hurt. 73's Richard Clark, KB7QHC What Richard neglected to specify is that the work of B, L, & E shows that there won't be significant current on the *outside* of the shield because of the burial. The current on the *inside* won't be affected. What's unknown is whether there was significant current on the outside during the measurement with the shorter cable. If so, the cable and probably the person doing the measuring became part of the antenna and would therefore affect its impedance. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Yagi in Proximity of Vertical/SNR problem..answers??? | Antenna | |||
Vertical antenna problem | Antenna | |||
Odd problem with 6/2/70 triband vertical | Antenna | |||
Dual Band vertical (2m/70 cm) problem / details | Antenna | |||
Hustler 6btv Vertical Tech Problem | Antenna |