Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
He has been getting louder and louder over
the years to the point of what I described in my earlier post about the problem with the TV's now. And even the very first time I approached him, I mentioned that I knew he was broadcasting illegally, and that we all have our hobbies, but his was interfering with mine, which at the time was home theater. He didn't deny that he wasn't illegal, at the time, and he did lower the power, for a while. I've approached this guy at least 5 times in the past few yrs, and every time he has lowered the power, for a while. Not this time, though, and it is now out of control. Well, I have some good news and some bad news for you. Let's do the bad news first, OK? As others have pointed out, it's entirely possible that your neighbor is transmitting legally. If he has a ham license, he could be transmitting with power levels of up to 1500 watts, in most bands, and still be entirely within the bounds of his license. The fact that he "didn't deny" that he was "broadcasting illegally" isn't proof, by any means. He may simply have not wanted to get into an argument with a neighbor who was making harsh accusations without proof or evidence (and, sorry to say, I *am* referring to you here). Unless you have evidence that he's transmitting without a license, or in ways which violate whatever license he has, you don't have much legal leverage, and probably won't be able to persuade anybody to do anything on your behalf. As others have pointed out... if a stereo amplifier, or loudspeaker, or telephone starts picking up and reproducing radio transmissions, then *this* device is defective/broken/badly-designed. This is a condition referred to as "undesired operation" - the phone or speaker is reacting to something (a strong RF field) which is irrelevant to this device's normal mode of operation. It is the position of the FCC that such "undesired operation" is a defect in the device in question, and not the fault of a (legal) radio transmission. It's is technically possible (and not all that difficult) to shield and filter devices such as amplifiers and phones so that they don't react to RF fields. Some manufacturers skimp on this filtering and shielding, in order to save money... and if the consumer buys such a device (rather than a more expensive, better- designed one) then any problems which result are the responsibility of the consumer and the device's manufacturer. Many, many consumer electronics devices these days come with a "Part 15" label or advisory, on the device or in the manual. Part of the wording says these devices "must not interfere" with licensed radio services, and "must accept" interference from both licensed and unlicensed radio services "including interference which causes undesired operation". That's the bad news. Now, for the good news. It's usually possible to add some after-market RF suppression devices to the affected components, and greatly reduce or entirely eliminate the interference. You can buy such devices over the counter or by mail, and they're not expensive. For phones, a small filter which plugs in between the phone cord and the wall outlet will often do the trick. Plug-in DSL filters are commonly available and will probably do the job well enough. For loudspeakers and stereos - in most cases I've seen, the RF is being picked up by the wires between the speaker and amplifier or PC... the wires act as antennas, carry the RF into the amplifier section, and the amplifier "detects" the RF by accident and converts it to audio and amplifies it. It is often possible to entirely eliminate such unwanted pickup by adding an interference suppressor (a.k.a "choke" or "ferrite") to each speaker wire, right before it enters the amplifier. The commonest variety is a "snap-on" two-part ferrite - snap it open, wind the speaker wire through it a few times (leaving a short stub of wire at the end), snap it closed, and reconnect the wire to the amplifier/receiver. With amplified speakers (computer or subwoofer), put a ferrite right at the speaker end of the wire. Adding ferrites to the AC power cords of the receiver, amplified subwoofers, etc. is also a good idea. For TV interference, you may need a "high-pass filter" connected in the antenna line right at the TV. This will keep the strong RF signal from your neighbor's transmitter out of the TV set's receiver. Ferrites and filters are probably available at your local Radio Shack, or by mailorder from quite a few suppliers. For further information about actually solving the problem, I'd suggest that you look at the ARRL's extensive collection of information about this issue. Start at http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/rfigen.html for a table of contents and a good overview of the basic issues involved. The "Information for neighbors of hams" page is also worthwhile reading. Oh... if you want to know whether your neighbor is a ham, you may be able to find out from: http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsS...rchLicense.jsp Click "Amateur", then plug in your zipcode and do a search. See if your neighbor's name comes up. However, even if your neighbor doesn't have a ham license, and is transmitting on CB, it's entirely possible that his transmissions could be getting into your radio even if they were limited to legal power... and if so, he wouldn't be under any obligation to stop transmitting or reduce power. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Dave Platt" wrote in message
... The fact that he "didn't deny" that he was "broadcasting illegally" isn't proof, by any means. I agree with you, Dave, but it's the usual case where it sure *looks* suspicious if someone who's doing something entirely legal doesn't claim as much when accused of doing something illegal. Something like, "Actually, I'm a licensed amateur radio operator, and my setup is perfectly legal, although I don't really care to debate this with you -- good day." is in no way provocative. I would suggest that the O.P. contact his local amateur radio club and see if anyone there has a spectrum analyzer -- that should very quickly resolve the question of whether he's transmitting on 11m or some ham frequency. If it is a ham frequency, I would agree that realistically one has to assume he's transmitting well within his legal rights, as (1) exact power measurements aren't going to be easy and (2) perfectly legal power levels can still cause plenty of interference. I would hope that all hams would be intersted in assisting the O.P. in this case. While the transmitter may well be a hermit ham operating perfectly legally, it's certainly in the amateur community's interest (and perhaps even charter) to help the O.P. out by at least verifying that the transmissions are plausibly legal, and then providing suggestions on reducing interference (if they are legal), as you have done. However, even if your neighbor doesn't have a ham license, and is transmitting on CB, it's entirely possible that his transmissions could be getting into your radio even if they were limited to legal power... Also true, but highly unlikely, IMO. This can usually be verified by just listening to the guy for awhile -- pretty much every CB'er I've ever met who had an amplifier liked to brag about it at some point on the air. Additionally, if some local ham with a spectrum analyzer can additionally estimate the gain of the antenna, he can estimate what sort of signal power a 5W CB should produce with a test dipole connected to his analyzer. If he's getting, e.g., 20dB or more above the estimate, the likelihood that it's a legal CB transmission is effectively zero. ---Joel |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Platt" wrote in message ... He has been getting louder and louder over the years to the point of what I described in my earlier post about the problem with the TV's now. And even the very first time I approached him, I mentioned that I knew he was broadcasting illegally, Bad way to get on someones good side. Usually considered fightin' words. Some places you can look up the local ham club and ask for help correcting at your end if you don't point fingers. As for myself and others I was brought up with, it was standard proceedure to insure cleanliness at our end, and bend over backward to make sure our neighbors were happy. Things like this aren't being taught in the seminars, nor is the knowledge getting through to newer recruits. I also had problems with a neighbor at one point and described to him exactly how to fix it at his end and due to his beligerance, he raged for another year before actually taking my advice, then appologizing and in fact THANKING me for the best TV reception he had never seen before. Take the step by step approach. Do away with any antenna Amp if possible and check for flaky connectors and cables. RG-59 cables should be thrown out in favor of RG-6 Quad shield for all TV cables including jumpers. All the the following is your best advise, but I find the snap together type of ferrites to have marginal results. Use the large Doughnut type that will allow you to loop the connector through several turns (4-10) for the Speaker wires and for the TV cable too (but use large loops to avoid kinking) just before going into the amplifier or stack. This is a good way to tidy up extra wire. Two or three doughnuts do better if you need extra protection This keeps the energy from riding along the cable right into the chassis where unintended bad things happen. With this setup I am able to watch of-the-air broadcast TV while operating a 500 watt station in the same room. I haven't bothered with the computer speakers in the next room though. They pick up the data noise from nearby cellphones but not the ham station... Go figure! Well, I have some good news and some bad news for you. Let's do the bad news first, OK? As others have pointed out, it's entirely possible that your neighbor is transmitting legally. If he has a ham license, he could be transmitting with power levels of up to 1500 watts, in most bands, and still be entirely within the bounds of his license. The fact that he "didn't deny" that he was "broadcasting illegally" isn't proof, by any means. He may simply have not wanted to get into an argument with a neighbor who was making harsh accusations without proof or evidence (and, sorry to say, I *am* referring to you here). Unless you have evidence that he's transmitting without a license, or in ways which violate whatever license he has, you don't have much legal leverage, and probably won't be able to persuade anybody to do anything on your behalf. As others have pointed out... if a stereo amplifier, or loudspeaker, or telephone starts picking up and reproducing radio transmissions, then *this* device is defective/broken/badly-designed. This is a condition referred to as "undesired operation" - the phone or speaker is reacting to something (a strong RF field) which is irrelevant to this device's normal mode of operation. It is the position of the FCC that such "undesired operation" is a defect in the device in question, and not the fault of a (legal) radio transmission. It's is technically possible (and not all that difficult) to shield and filter devices such as amplifiers and phones so that they don't react to RF fields. Some manufacturers skimp on this filtering and shielding, in order to save money... and if the consumer buys such a device (rather than a more expensive, better- designed one) then any problems which result are the responsibility of the consumer and the device's manufacturer. Many, many consumer electronics devices these days come with a "Part 15" label or advisory, on the device or in the manual. Part of the wording says these devices "must not interfere" with licensed radio services, and "must accept" interference from both licensed and unlicensed radio services "including interference which causes undesired operation". That's the bad news. Now, for the good news. It's usually possible to add some after-market RF suppression devices to the affected components, and greatly reduce or entirely eliminate the interference. You can buy such devices over the counter or by mail, and they're not expensive. For phones, a small filter which plugs in between the phone cord and the wall outlet will often do the trick. Plug-in DSL filters are commonly available and will probably do the job well enough. For loudspeakers and stereos - in most cases I've seen, the RF is being picked up by the wires between the speaker and amplifier or PC... the wires act as antennas, carry the RF into the amplifier section, and the amplifier "detects" the RF by accident and converts it to audio and amplifies it. It is often possible to entirely eliminate such unwanted pickup by adding an interference suppressor (a.k.a "choke" or "ferrite") to each speaker wire, right before it enters the amplifier. The commonest variety is a "snap-on" two-part ferrite - snap it open, wind the speaker wire through it a few times (leaving a short stub of wire at the end), snap it closed, and reconnect the wire to the amplifier/receiver. With amplified speakers (computer or subwoofer), put a ferrite right at the speaker end of the wire. Adding ferrites to the AC power cords of the receiver, amplified subwoofers, etc. is also a good idea. For TV interference, you may need a "high-pass filter" connected in the antenna line right at the TV. This will keep the strong RF signal from your neighbor's transmitter out of the TV set's receiver. Ferrites and filters are probably available at your local Radio Shack, or by mailorder from quite a few suppliers. For further information about actually solving the problem, I'd suggest that you look at the ARRL's extensive collection of information about this issue. Start at http://www.arrl.org/tis/info/rfigen.html for a table of contents and a good overview of the basic issues involved. The "Information for neighbors of hams" page is also worthwhile reading. Oh... if you want to know whether your neighbor is a ham, you may be able to find out from: http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/UlsS...rchLicense.jsp Click "Amateur", then plug in your zipcode and do a search. See if your neighbor's name comes up. However, even if your neighbor doesn't have a ham license, and is transmitting on CB, it's entirely possible that his transmissions could be getting into your radio even if they were limited to legal power... and if so, he wouldn't be under any obligation to stop transmitting or reduce power. -- Dave Platt AE6EO Friends of Jade Warrior home page: http://www.radagast.org/jade-warrior I do _not_ wish to receive unsolicited commercial email, and I will boycott any company which has the gall to send me such ads! |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 20, 10:22*pm, "JB" wrote:
"Dave Platt" wrote in message ... He has been getting louder and louder over the years to the point of what I described in my earlier post about the problem with the TV's now. And even the very first time I approached him, I mentioned that I knew he was broadcasting illegally, Bad way to get on someones good side. *Usually considered fightin' words. Really? You have no idea about how the conversation transpired. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
DES wrote:
On Aug 20, 10:22 pm, "JB" wrote: "Dave Platt" wrote in message ... He has been getting louder and louder over the years to the point of what I described in my earlier post about the problem with the TV's now. And even the very first time I approached him, I mentioned that I knew he was broadcasting illegally, Bad way to get on someones good side. Usually considered fightin' words. Really? You have no idea about how the conversation transpired. He knows enough that you told the neighbor he was broadcasting illegally. Just like you said. So okay. Do you want to solve the problem, or do you want to be one of the stories on Dateline some evening? About the two nieghbors who couldn't get along, and it escalated into something much worse... Perhaps it isn't important for you to get along with your neighbors, but you made it a lot harder to fix the problem. If this person is a Ham and operating legally, it's your responsibility. In most cases the Ham is really happy to help, because in most cases, they just want to be a good neighbor. Oh, but wait, you already poisoned the waters. After all, He's doing this illegally, eh? On the other hand, if he is a CB'er using illegal power, you have a whole lot more leverage. You can turn him in to the F.C.C. and they can take care of the matter. But wait! He knows exactly who turned him in, doesn't he? But your attitude here in the group, where people are actually trying to help you, indicates that you might be just as worried about "being right" as you are about having the problem fixed. People try to give good advice, and you get p***d off at them. Have fun! - 73 de Mike N3LI - |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Aug 21, 10:42*am, Michael Coslo wrote:
But your attitude here in the group, where people are actually trying to help you, indicates that you might be just as worried about "being right" as you are about having the problem fixed. People try to give good advice, and you get p***d off at them. Have fun! I said TWICE now, that I'm getting the filters. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
And even the very first time I approached him, I mentioned that I knew
he was broadcasting illegally, Bad way to get on someones good side. Usually considered fightin' words. /Really? /You have no idea about how the conversation transpired. Truly... I see you weren't interested in anything else I said. Perhaps the conversation was worse than I imagined. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|