In message , John Smith
writes
JB wrote:
... The notion that
apes transitioned into humans is more farfetched than if we were evolved
from ferns or fruit flies, if we were to compare the DNA structures. Today
we have youth wearing "natural selection" T-shirts going on shooting sprees
and random gang killings for tatoos so don't tell me about evolution.
...

If one were to tear apart a mud hut, and then a state-of-the-art
building, he/she would only find the basic building blocks are more
similar then dissimilar ... most likely, 99%+ of the elements in the
state of the art building can also be found in the mud-hut ... I see no
reason why someone should expect different in the basic building blocks
of life.

First there is a prototype, then improved designs, and at some point in
the future, or far-far-future, a finished design (maybe.)

We are all looking at the same "evidence" alright, the crux of the
matter is in the interpretation(s.)

Regards,
JS
Half-a-Brain-McCain'n Insane; So Lawdy Mama, It Looks Like Obama!

John,
You have a typo in the slogan after your 'signature'. [At least, I
presume it's a typo.] It's annoying me intensely. Please would you
correct it.
--
Ian

On Sun, 31 Aug 2008 19:08:36 +0100, Ian Jackson
wrote:

John,
You have a typo in the slogan after your 'signature'. [At least, I
presume it's a typo.] It's annoying me intensely. Please would you
correct it.

Hi Ian,

Are you referring to the minstrel baiting term? It's bad enough to
tolerate this anonymous carnival of religious cliches with their
dialog of obscene pandering.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Richard Clark wrote:

...
Hi Ian,

Are you referring to the minstrel baiting term? It's bad enough to
tolerate this anonymous carnival of religious cliches with their
dialog of obscene pandering.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Has someone snuck into this forum and now lies under the bleachers
bellowing for help? I thought I heard some inane and insane rantings
from an individual out of his mind with pain!

Reminds me of that poor b*st*ard which used to go around mumbling quotes
from Shakespeare in reply to technical discussions ... at least he is
gone for the moment, or so it might seem. :-)

Regards,
JS

Richard Clark wrote:

...
Hi Ian,

Are you referring to the minstrel baiting term? It's bad enough to
tolerate this anonymous carnival of religious cliches with their
dialog of obscene pandering.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC

Hmmm, playing, "I am taking the high road game, huh?

Ok. Well, here is my favorite version:

Fee-fi-fo-fum
I smell the blood of an Englishman.
Be he alive or be he dead
I'll grind his bones to make my bread. -- "Jack the Giant Killer."

Now, one sure to be your fav:

"Child Roland to the dark tower came,
His word was still, Fie, foh, and fum,
I smell the blood of a British man." -- Shakespeare, "King Lear."

And, for those finding neither to their liking:

"O, tis a precious apothegmatical Pedant, who will find matter enough to
dilate a whole day of the first invention of Fy, fa, fum, I smell the
blood of an English-man". -- Thomas Nashe, "Have with you to
Saffron-walden."

Ahhh, remember the good-ole-days when you could write this
gooble-de-gook for yourself? A burden which has now befell my
shoulders--I only thank God they are broad (my shoulders of course, not
the women!) :-(

However, Shakespeare does seem to befit some as more appropiate
"trolling lines" than myself ...

Regards,
JS

Ian Jackson wrote:

John,
You have a typo in the slogan after your 'signature'. [At least, I
presume it's a typo.] It's annoying me intensely. Please would you
correct it.

Ian:

How about just disabling it, that was really enough of that anyway ... ;-)

Regards,
JS

In message , John Smith
writes
Ian Jackson wrote:

John,
You have a typo in the slogan after your 'signature'. [At least, I
presume it's a typo.] It's annoying me intensely. Please would you
correct it.

Ian:

How about just disabling it, that was really enough of that anyway ... ;-)

Regards,
JS

No, I like the sentiment expressed. It's just the typo that is getting
to me!!!
--
Ian

"Ian Jackson" wrote in message
...
In message , John Smith
writes
Ian Jackson wrote:

John,
You have a typo in the slogan after your 'signature'. [At least, I
presume it's a typo.] It's annoying me intensely. Please would you
correct it.

Ian:

How about just disabling it, that was really enough of that anyway ...
;-)

Regards,
JS

No, I like the sentiment expressed. It's just the typo that is getting
to me!!!
--
Ian

So who makes up the slogans for the dems? Is it some kind of secret code?
Except for the fact that they hold peoples jobs and freedoms with an iron
fist and treat us all like school children, the candidates don't seem to do
anything of merit. Is it really all about blaming the other guy about what
your people are getting away with under their watch?

JB wrote:

...
So who makes up the slogans for the dems? Is it some kind of secret code?
Except for the fact that they hold peoples jobs and freedoms with an iron
fist and treat us all like school children, the candidates don't seem to do
anything of merit. Is it really all about blaming the other guy about what
your people are getting away with under their watch?



Do you really think the "men" behind the curtain(s) pulling the puppets
strings are from different groups? i.e., Republicrats vs. Democans.

Fat chance; Me thinks the game is fixed. However, the "Laws of
Illusion(s)" dictates it is only that which is perceived which counts ...

Regards,
JS

"John Smith" wrote in message
...
JB wrote:

...
So who makes up the slogans for the dems? Is it some kind of secret
code?
Except for the fact that they hold peoples jobs and freedoms with an
iron
fist and treat us all like school children, the candidates don't seem to
do
anything of merit. Is it really all about blaming the other guy about
what
your people are getting away with under their watch?



Do you really think the "men" behind the curtain(s) pulling the puppets
strings are from different groups? i.e., Republicrats vs. Democans.

Fat chance; Me thinks the game is fixed. However, the "Laws of
Illusion(s)" dictates it is only that which is perceived which counts ...

Regards,
JS

I have often considered the Good Cop Bad Cop theory of the Rep - Dem scam on
the people. The fact that they go to the same parties and get-togethers
means they share the same thoughts. It doesn't mean there is a conspiracy
per-se. Think of it as one big party that everyone has to go to or be left
out, and even though everyone goes kissy-kissy, they are knifing in the
back. Distrust and polite smack is all around. Rather than conspiracy
though, there is convergence in thought on matters brought to light to be
wrestled over while more important matters are forgotten for the moment. We
the People get left behind.

Who do you vote for though... Obama has been hanging around the Rev. kill
whitey bunch for too long. No telling what disease he might have picked up.
There also seems to be some overcompensation, the way he so desperately
needs to validate himself with every group that he forgets who he is from
day to day. By the same token, what damage was done to McCain while being
thrashed in the POW camp. But he does seem to have tolerance and compassion
even though he sticks to his guns.

The fact we are narrowed to two parties smacks of some kind of collusion.
Especially in the light of certain travesties of the Dems that the Reps are
curiously silent on. Perhaps McCain is so attractive due to the fact he has
proven to be less of a party lapdog.

JB wrote:

...
I have often considered the Good Cop Bad Cop theory of the Rep - Dem scam on
the people. The fact that they go to the same parties and get-togethers
means they share the same thoughts. It doesn't mean there is a conspiracy
per-se. Think of it as one big party that everyone has to go to or be left
out, and even though everyone goes kissy-kissy, they are knifing in the
back. Distrust and polite smack is all around. Rather than conspiracy
though, there is convergence in thought on matters brought to light to be
wrestled over while more important matters are forgotten for the moment. We
the People get left behind.

Who do you vote for though... Obama has been hanging around the Rev. kill
whitey bunch for too long. No telling what disease he might have picked up.
There also seems to be some overcompensation, the way he so desperately
needs to validate himself with every group that he forgets who he is from
day to day. By the same token, what damage was done to McCain while being
thrashed in the POW camp. But he does seem to have tolerance and compassion
even though he sticks to his guns.

The fact we are narrowed to two parties smacks of some kind of collusion.
Especially in the light of certain travesties of the Dems that the Reps are
curiously silent on. Perhaps McCain is so attractive due to the fact he has
proven to be less of a party lapdog.


When Martin Luther King got them to promise, "OK, we are going to cut
you in on a piece of the pie ..." They suddenly kicked open the doors
on immigration from starving/impoverished 3rd world nations and added
the words, to the above, "NOW, grab yourself a piece of that pie!"

"That is 'IT', in a nutshell." However, there are whole books which
would could be written to fill in what the above doesn't mention.

Many have good reason to fear Obama. If he cuts in his friends,
relatives and people of his like color, ethnicity and background(s), we
are all in for "sharing a piece of our pie!" And, we all know it has to
happen, we were just hoping to put it off and let our children deal with
it (like deficit spending, where we have put off our bills for our
children to pay.)

Now, that is enough, I am done with this sub-off-topic-thread ... you
will excuse my leave ...

Regards,
JS
I was just wondering, "Could Jesus possibly have pointed ears like
spock?" 8-)