LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #9   Report Post  
Old March 10th 04, 03:50 PM
Cecil Moore
 
Posts: n/a
Default

Reg Edwards wrote:
In view of the nil replies to the following posting it's safe to say that's
another old wives' tale which bites the dust.


Reg, we have a clear example of where the high voltage part of the
antenna is not allowed to radiate (much). That would be a balanced
top hat. Not allowing the high voltage part of the antenna to radiate
leaves the high current part to do most of the radiating. We know from
field strength measurements that a mobile antenna with a balanced top
hat can radiate as well (or better than) an antenna equipped with a
radiating high voltage top section.

If you keep the high voltage portion of the antenna and replace the
high current portion with an antenna tuner, the field strength falls
by some 12 dB.

Lengthening the high current section under the loading coil has a
much greater effect than lengthening the high-voltage section on top
of the loading coil.
--
73, Cecil http://www.qsl.net/w5dxp



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:15 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017