Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#24
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "christofire" wrote in message ... "Jerry" wrote in message ... - snip - I have problems with believing there will be any current in either dipole. What am I missing? Jerry KD6JDJ That's understandable. Chris Hi Chris Tell me, did you guys ever decide that there would be a far field generated by the spinning dipole with DC on it? I dont refer to the inductive field. Maybe there is no way to separate Far Field from any condition where an inductive field is generated. Jerry KD6JDJ Jerry, I think you're right - in the far field there is spherical spreading of power without regard to separate magnetic and electric components that an antenna, of whatever form, might produce. Of course the radiated power incident on any surface can be represented by an equivalent value of electric or magnetic field strength but this is on strict understanding that the counterpart (magnetic or electric) component is present with the requisite field strength (E/H = Zo = 377 ohms in free space) and PFD = E2/Zo. The answer to your first question is 'yes - hypothetically' there 'would be a far field generated by the spinning dipole with DC on it' but this shouldn't be taken as a recipe for some wacky rotating machine. As I outlined earlier, there is probably little practical application for this interesting analogy because if it were ever put into practice it would probably be hopelessly inefficient and transformation of Maxwell's equations into an inertial frame spinning at the radio frequency is hard, to say the least! As has been suggested, it's probably best to take the concept no further than an interesting thought exercise - if you don't understand that, don't worry, you're not missing much Chris Hi Chris I am having a block in my learning. As I understand it, this would actually happen if it could be performed. A spinning dipole would require more power to spin it if it had DC on it than if it had no DC on it. And, actually, it would require no power to keep the dipole spinning since there would be that theoritical vacuum around it. But, once you apply the DC, power would be required to keep it spinning. That amount of added power would be determined by the amount of DC applied. Do you confirm that this is true? My question relates to my ignorance about what there is in the "vacuum" to cause "drag". Jerry KD6JDJ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Circular Parasitic | Antenna | |||
Quad and circular polarization | Antenna | |||
Quasi Synchronous?? | Shortwave | |||
Circular V.S. Vertical antenna polarization ! | Broadcasting | |||
circular radiation! | Antenna |