Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
NEC2 model of 40m loaded cubical quad
Hi - I am trying to play around with modeling a loaded 40 meter
cubical quad. To start I made a single loop the size I wanted (about 2/3 full size) - I then looked at the impedance on 7.1Mhz. I added a load (inductance) to bring the loop to resonance on 7.1Mhz. I then created some parasitic elements - a director and reflector. I used the same value load for these elements. Now, can I just adjust the lengths of the wires to tune the feedpoint impedance and directivity and leave the value of the load alone? Or is there some reason I will need to adjust those values too? I placed the load opposite the feedpoint, FYI. -Scott, WU2X |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
NEC2 model of 40m loaded cubical quad
On Dec 14, 11:16�am, Scott M wrote:
Hi - I am trying to play around with modeling a loaded 40 meter cubical quad. To start I made a single �loop the size I wanted (about 2/3 full size) - I then looked at the impedance on 7.1Mhz. I added a load (inductance) to bring the loop to resonance on 7.1Mhz. I then created some parasitic elements - a director and reflector. I used the same value load for these elements. Now, can I just adjust the lengths of the wires to tune the feedpoint impedance and directivity and leave the value of the load alone? Or is there some reason I will need to adjust those values too? �I placed the load opposite the feedpoint, FYI. -Scott, WU2X Hi Scott, Seems to me since this is a quad that your goal is maximum gain or F/B. As such, I would adjust the loads and element spacing keeping the element lengths constant, until you have the current distribution in the elements optimum for your goal. Then check the source impedance, and if it is not too bad, devise a way to match. Suggest that instead of a single load opposite the source, use two loads, should help with current distribution. Good luck. Gary N4AST |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
NEC2 model of 40m loaded cubical quad
Gary,
I wrote some code to automate the optimization of the quad for my goals - but my code only deals with element length, so I am hoping that I don't need to add more code to manipulate the value of the load too. -Scott, WU2X On Dec 14, 5:23*pm, wrote: On Dec 14, 11:16 am, Scott M wrote: Hi - I am trying to play around with modeling a loaded 40 meter cubical quad. To start I made a single loop the size I wanted (about 2/3 full size) - I then looked at the impedance on 7.1Mhz. I added a load (inductance) to bring the loop to resonance on 7.1Mhz. I then created some parasitic elements - a director and reflector. I used the same value load for these elements. Now, can I just adjust the lengths of the wires to tune the feedpoint impedance and directivity and leave the value of the load alone? Or is there some reason I will need to adjust those values too? I placed the load opposite the feedpoint, FYI. -Scott, WU2X Hi Scott, *Seems to me since this is a quad that your goal is maximum gain or F/B. *As such, I would adjust the loads and element spacing keeping the element lengths constant, until you have the current distribution in the elements optimum for your goal. *Then check the source impedance, and if it is not too bad, devise a way to match. Suggest that instead of a single load opposite the source, use two loads, should help with current distribution. *Good luck. Gary N4AST |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
NEC2 model of 40m loaded cubical quad
It will be much easier to make the two elements exactly the same
in terms of wire lengths, and just increase the load for the reflector element. Tor N4OGW |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
NEC2 model of 40m loaded cubical quad
On Dec 14, 10:03�pm, Scott M wrote:
Gary, I wrote some code to automate the optimization of the quad for my goals - but my code only deals with element length, so I am hoping that I don't need to add more code to manipulate the value of the load too. -Scott, WU2X - Show quoted text - OK, for modelling purposes, you can keep the load constant, and vary the element lengths. From a practical standpoint, if you have this beast up in the air, tuning is easier with a tapped inductor. Other factors that will effect the gain and F/B are the element spacing, and how high you can get the thing. Practically, these are not things you can change easily. I just did a quick 2 element 66% (reflector) quad in a diamond configuration with 17' spacing on EZNEC, and got a 10.25 dbi gain at 35 degrees. F/B about 13 db. Feedpoint impedance was 44+j0 with a 678pf shunt capacitor. The element lengths were the same on both, varied loads to get max gain and best match. The center of the diamond was 50' up. Gary N4AST |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Free HF Cubical Quad Parts | Swap | |||
Quad loop supported by single tower - NEC2 modeling question | Antenna | |||
2L Steppir or 2L Cubical quad | Antenna | |||
How to model a 6:1 ratio balun using NEC2 | Antenna | |||
how to model a loaded vertical ?? | Antenna |