Roy Lewallen wrote:
1. The people who already already know and understand what I'm explaining;

Assumes that you are omniscient and others should worship at
your feet.

2. The people who think they know and understand what I'm explaining,
but don't, and won't change their minds no matter what I write;

Assumes that you are omniscient and anyone who disagrees with
you is wrong.

3. The people who are willing to read and understand what I write, and
learn from it or at least think about it.

Assumes that you are omniscient and people can only learn
facts from you.

Roy, I don't think that any assumption of your omniscience
is warranted. Is it impossible that you are wrong about
anything in the world? Is the reason that you absolutely
refuse to engage in a rational discussion of the role of
interference in antenna systems because you might be proven
to be wrong and also learn something new in the process?
--
73, Cecil http://www.w5dxp.com