Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Jeff Liebermann wrote: I'm also wondering if the electrical characteristics of water are an issue for an HF dummy load. Even if someone dumps salt water into the paint can, the conduction losses to ground from the resistor to the can ground can't be all that much below 30MHz. It's probably not worth much, but here's some anecdotal evidence. About 50 years ago several of us at W8LT (The Ohio State University amateur radio club) needed a low-power dummy load to be used at moderate frequencies (e.g. 20 meters). I came up with the idea of immersing a 2 watt, 51 ohm carbon resistor in a large glass of Columbus, Ohio tap water. We found that at 14 MHz putting the resistor under water made negligible change in observed SWR, which surprised me because Columbus water (unlike the stuff we're blessed with here in the Vancouver, BC area which comes right from the mountain snow-pack) was fairly hard. This also indicated that the water didn't put too much capacitance in parallel with the resistance. Water-cooling did allow the 2 watt resistor to absorb a fair bit more power than 2 watts, at least for a while until the water heated up too much. Thermal Conductivity Viscosity W/mK cSt @20c Water 0.6 0.9 AF (glycol) 0.24 2.0 Water+AF 0.8(?) 1.5 50%/50% Silicon Oil 0.1 varies radically Mineral Oil 0.138 34.5 Fluorinert FC-77 0.063 0.75 Ok, I see why. Water has 1/5th of the thermal conductivity of mineral oil. It's still a heck of a lot better than air. As I recall, we were in a hurry, we had the resistor, and we didn't have any suitable oil on hand. David. ex-W8EZE -- David Ryeburn To send e-mail, use "ca" instead of "caz". |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cantenna dummyload oil | Homebrew | |||
Heath Cantenna | Boatanchors | |||
Heath Cantenna | Equipment | |||
Cantenna | Boatanchors | |||
Cantenna | Boatanchors |