Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Installing a Ladder Line to the house
On Jan 8, 7:50*am, "Ed Cregger" wrote:
The aversion to transmatches is a ham cultural trait that has no basis in reality, just as the CB'ers are hooked on resonant 50 ohm antennas. It's a characteristic of the culture(s) of both types of operators, with no basis in practical operating engineering. Ed, N2ECW I wouldn't say that. As an example, I've done tests showing that no matter how careful I am with the tuner, it's settings, decent open wire feeder, etc, I could never quite equal the performance of a coax fed dipole when feeding the same antenna using the tuner and ladder line. Quite close granted, and to many people a non issue, but there *was* a difference. Of course, the coax fed dipoles I use would generally be considered a single band antenna. But that's no problem here. But if I have my way, I avoid tuners if possible. I'm trading the ability of fairly efficient multi band use, for the slightly more efficient coax fed single band antenna. I want to radiate every drop of RF I can. Also the settings of the tuner are fairly critical for the most efficient use. I have a 989c also, and I have done extensive testing with it using various settings vs efficiency. I found with the usual T network tuner such as the 989c, you might be able to tune a load with 25 or more settings. But only the setting using the least inductance will be fairly low loss. All of the settings that use more inductance than required show more tuner loss. Up to about 20% of your power is lost in a worst case scenario. So that is another issue. Small, being as one can make sure to use the least inductance, but it's just another thing to fuss with when changing bands. Myself, I prefer to use multiple element antenna elements to provide multi band capability. The system efficiency is very high, and I don't have to do anything when I change bands. It's not using a resonant antenna that makes it very efficient. It's the ability to use the 50 ohm radio to a low loss 50 ohm feed line, straight to the appx 50 ohm antenna without any semi lossy mickey mouse stuff in between. :/ Now if I were required to use only one wire for all bands, I wouldn't have any problems using ladder line and the tuner to feed a single dipole. It will work quite well, and being I don't have the coax fed to compare to, no one will notice the difference. But I bet they would notice a slight difference if I did have both to compare to. The reason I know this is because I have tried it. "75m" I could see the difference on receive, no real need to compare on air reports. But I did anyway, and as expected, they saw about the same difference between the two systems. When comparing the ladder line and tuner system vs the coax system, if I had a signal that was 40 db over S9 on the tuner system, it would bump up to about 45 db over S9 with the coax feed. For me to see that large a difference on receive, the tuner loss can not be considered to be just an illusion or not based in reality. I have no problems with anyone else using one, but I think it's a stretch to say that anyone that prefers to avoid one is trying to emulate a CB'er.. :/ |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
ladder line?? | Antenna | |||
Using Twin Lead or Ladder Line for your Antenna's Feed-in-Line ? - Then 'consider' a Pair of Vintage Style TV Antenna Clips . . . | Shortwave | |||
Feed Line Length - Ladder Line | Antenna | |||
Source For 72 or 75 Ohm Ladder Line ??? | Antenna |