Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old March 6th 09, 05:47 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 625
Default annealed coax

I have heard there is a process where coax cable is baked in an oven
to lessen the effects of temperature change of the cable on phase
shift. I havent been able to find any information on this process.
Direction to any information on the subject would be greatly
appreciated.

Jimmie
  #2   Report Post  
Old March 7th 09, 12:05 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Mar 2007
Posts: 801
Default annealed coax

JIMMIE wrote:
I have heard there is a process where coax cable is baked in an oven
to lessen the effects of temperature change of the cable on phase
shift. I havent been able to find any information on this process.
Direction to any information on the subject would be greatly
appreciated.

Jimmie

mostly it's done by empirical methods..

The idea is to relieve internal stresses by several temperature cycles,
reducing at least one source of phase change.

In reality, what you want is "consistent and repeatable phase change vs
temperature without hysteresis"... hysteresis or randomness is usually
due to mechanical effects (stick/slip, etc.), so temperature cycling
fixes it.

google for phase-stable coaxial cable and you'll probably find
manufacturer sites that discuss it.

BTW, there's "low phase change cable" and "repeatable phase change
cable", and sometimes one is better than the other in a particular
application.
  #3   Report Post  
Old March 7th 09, 04:34 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 625
Default annealed coax

On Mar 6, 6:05*pm, Jim Lux wrote:
JIMMIE wrote:
I have heard there is a process where coax cable is baked in an oven
to lessen the effects of temperature change of the cable on phase
shift. I havent been able to find any information on this process.
Direction to any information on the subject would be greatly
appreciated.


Jimmie


mostly it's done by empirical methods..

The idea is to relieve internal stresses by several temperature cycles,
reducing at least one source of phase change.

In reality, what you want is "consistent and repeatable phase change vs
temperature without hysteresis"... hysteresis or randomness is usually
due to mechanical effects (stick/slip, etc.), so temperature cycling
fixes it.


Yes, I think this is the problem. There are multiple cables that must
remain phase matched fairly closely and they are exposed to the
weather. If there was a sudden change in phase of the signal on one
cable that would definatly be a problem. Any cable that does not have
hysterisis would probably work. I also realize now that the type of
cable being used is probably the worst possible choice. Just swiching
to a foam dielectic cable may solve the problem.


Jimmie
  #4   Report Post  
Old March 7th 09, 10:03 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2008
Posts: 23
Default annealed coax

On Sat, 07 Mar 2009 07:34:32 -0800, JIMMIE wrote:

On Mar 6, 6:05Â*pm, Jim Lux wrote:
JIMMIE wrote:
I have heard there is a process where coax cable is baked in an oven
to lessen the effects of temperature change of the cable on phase
shift. I havent been able to find any information on this process.
Direction to any information on the subject would be greatly
appreciated.


Jimmie


mostly it's done by empirical methods..

The idea is to relieve internal stresses by several temperature cycles,
reducing at least one source of phase change.

In reality, what you want is "consistent and repeatable phase change vs
temperature without hysteresis"... hysteresis or randomness is usually
due to mechanical effects (stick/slip, etc.), so temperature cycling
fixes it.


Yes, I think this is the problem. There are multiple cables that must
remain phase matched fairly closely and they are exposed to the weather.
If there was a sudden change in phase of the signal on one cable that
would definatly be a problem. Any cable that does not have hysterisis
would probably work. I also realize now that the type of cable being
used is probably the worst possible choice. Just swiching to a foam
dielectic cable may solve the problem.


Jimmie


A little story of mine about phased coax....

No matter what the consultants tell you, make the two (or more) sample
lines the same length and exposed to the elements in the same manner.

I ran into a sample loop problem on an 5 tower AM directional array where
the coax from the sample loops were cut to the needed length and the
phase difference was compensated for in the antenna monitor. There was a
difference of several hundred feet between runs. Plus, one monitor loop
was a hundred feet higher up a tower.

Once I made the sample runs the same using phase matched coax, coiling
the same amount of coax on each tower then coiling the same access
underground, the readings changed drastically and the array became more
manageable. The insanity had ended!

Before installing the coax, measure each of them with connectors
installed using a signal gen and splitter. Align the antenna monitor for
0phase on all inputs with a signal gen and splitter, then add the coax to
the monitor with the signal gen and splitter on the other end before
installing onto the tower to confirm system integrity. Excessive bends
both in number and radius can change the phase of one line over the other
so be conscious of how you make the individual runs!

If your under the FCC, make sure you have a CP. :-)
  #5   Report Post  
Old March 8th 09, 03:09 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jan 2007
Posts: 61
Default annealed coax

I also realize now that the type of
cable being used is probably the worst possible choice. Just swiching
to a foam dielectic cable may solve the problem.

Jimmie


The physical dimensions of the coax changes with temperature. The
ratios of inner and outer diameter stays pretty much the same, so the
Z doesn't change, but the epsilon of the dielectric changes (it's less
dense at higher temperatures). since propagation speed goes as 1/sqrt
(epsilon), and the density goes as 1/t^3, the prop speed goes as 1/
(sqrt(1/t^3)) = t^(3/2)...

On top of that the coax gets longer as a function of T, so the time
delay/phase goes as T/(t^1.5) or 1/sqrt(T).

A CTE of 30ppm/deg C is about 0.05%/deg C for time delay. If your
coax is 1 wavelength long, a change of 5C is about a degree. (0.25% =
1 part in 400, 360 degrees/wavelength, etc.)

You can see that working at microwave frequencies, where coax might be
100 wavelengths long, trying to match to a degree is a challenge.
Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FS: Coax Connectors, Adapters & Bulk Coax Cable AAA RF Products Swap 1 December 20th 06 04:13 AM
Coax To Coax Noise transfer ? Robert11 Antenna 2 March 18th 06 10:16 PM
Coax To Coax Noise Transfer ? Robert11 Shortwave 5 March 13th 06 11:05 PM
Skywire coax cable vs. regular coax cable Jack Antenna 6 November 1st 04 05:04 PM
FS:RG8X 18 FT LENGTH COAX WITH COAX CONNECTOR Kb9igg Swap 0 October 31st 03 05:54 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:03 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017