LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #6   Report Post  
Old May 13th 09, 10:08 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jun 2006
Posts: 440
Default Radial straight down

On May 11, 7:23*am, "Richard" wrote:
Has anyone ever bored a hole into the ground and dangled a radial or
counterpoise down it instead of burying a radial 6" horizontally under the
ground or stringing out a counterpoise?


RF currents needing to travel a lengthy path through the earth to
reach such a vertical buried wire would encounter high losses.

The function of buried radials is to provide a low loss return path
for the r-f conduction currents induced in the earth near a monopole,
which result from displacement currents generated by radiation from
the monopole. Almost all of these currents lie within a radius of 1/2
of a free-space wavelength (regardless of the monopole height).

So the most efficient collection of these ground currents means the
radials should extend about 1/2 of a free-space wavelength from the
base of the monopole -- so that the currents won't have to travel very
far through the lossy earth before they are "captured" by a radial
wire.

The electrical length of buried radials with respect to the reduced
v.p. in their environment has no real bearing on how effective the
radials are at reducing the r-f loss in the ground system.

The r-f loss present in the radial ground system doesn't affect the
shape of the relative field pattern generated by the monopole, or the
propagation of the fields launched by the monopole. But as that
ground system loss is in series with antenna current, it will affect
the radiation efficiency of the antenna system.

A benchmark, real-world study of this subject was made by Brown, Lewis
& Epstein of RCA Labs in 1937. It showed showed that 113 evenly-
spaced, buried radials each 0.412 free-space wavelengths long and used
with monopoles from ~70 to 90 degrees in height produced measured
surface-wave fields at 3/10 of a mile that were within 2% of those
generated by a perfect monopole with a zero-loss r-f ground, over a
zero-loss ground plane.

This corresponds to an antenna system efficiency of about 96%, or 960
watts radiated for 1,000 watts applied to the feedpoint. For a
monopole with a radiation resistance of 36 ohms this 96% efficiency
means that the r-f resistance in the ground system is about 1.5 ohms.
There wouldn't be much practical benefit gained by using more/longer
radials.

The BL&E tests were conducted in the sandy soil of New Jersey, where
earth conductivity is rather poor.

RF
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Radial wire John Ferrell Antenna 9 October 28th 06 02:39 PM
Radial Grounds Richard Fry Antenna 1 January 24th 06 01:45 AM
Yet Another Radial Question Mike Coslo Antenna 27 May 3rd 05 05:30 AM
Radial connections Bill Ogden Antenna 0 November 18th 04 10:35 PM
radial question larry d clark Antenna 1 October 13th 04 09:01 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:55 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017