Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
ATU: Correct way to specify impedance range
On May 21, 11:30*am, wrote:
.... I was expecting that this only happens in the Netherlands. *I have some (modern) software where the default plot method is Schmit Chart... I agree with the contour plot on a Smith Chart showing losses (and power handling) for Antenna Tuners. Best regards, Wim PA3DJSwww.tetech.nl forget first three letters of the alphabet in the PM Since the points plotted on a Smith chart are simply complex reflection coefficient plotted on a linear grid, it would be fine with me if they'd just plot the range of complex reflection coefficient over which the tuner will operate (perhaps plus contours of constant loss and power handling ability). The graphs would look identically the same, except for the grid. I don't suppose any more hams understand complex reflection coefficient than understand Smith charts, though. The Smith chart, to me, remains a very valuable _visualization_ tool. It matters not how the points on it were calculated or measured. I think it will always be the case that information properly presented graphically will generally be easier to understand and easier to draw conclusions from than information presented in text in tabular form. Some graphical tools, such as the Smith chart, are worth getting to know, even if you don't use the chart itself to do calculations, deferring instead to other calculators for that part. Pictures, often, are worth much more than 1000 words. Cheers, Tom |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
ATU: Correct way to specify impedance range
K7ITM wrote:
The Smith chart, to me, remains a very valuable _visualization_ tool. Here's a recent posting of mine from eHam.net: someone wrote: There are very few people out there that use the Smith Chart. I'm not suggesting that they actually use a Smith Chart - just that they learn how to use one and keep the Smith Chart in their heads as a conceptual tool. With a conceptual image of a Smith Chart in their heads, they not only know what the input and output impedances are but also the path the impedance took to get from one point to another. Did the SWR spiral cross the 50 ohm circle or the 1/50 mho circle during its transition? If so, matching to 50 ohms is a one component piece of cake. -- 73, Cecil, IEEE, OOTC, http://www.w5dxp.com |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
How much can the impedance of coax vary from its characteristic impedance? | Antenna | |||
Schedules that are correct? | Shortwave | |||
IC-781 group - correct URL | Equipment | |||
Correct Diplexer/duplexer | Antenna | |||
Is This Correct?? | Shortwave |