LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #3   Report Post  
Old June 7th 09, 05:16 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default Polarized radiation

On Sun, 07 Jun 2009 10:44:19 GMT, "Dave" wrote:
"Szczepan Bialek" wrote in message
...
( my knowledge about antennas is zero).


that is obvious


Watch it Dave, that last statement is Gaussian and lacks the "t"
variable making it static. Getting the jump on Art and adding "t", it
becomes:
( my knowledge about antennas will always be zero at this rate)


This added time dimension cannot be in dispute, can it? It brings
equilibrium, was proven by Newton, and thoroughly demolishes
Einstein's work in the same stroke. (Patent Pending, so it must be
true).

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Man-made noise: why vertical polarized? lw1ecp Homebrew 1 January 8th 08 08:40 PM
Non-polarized electrolytic RXJR Equipment 3 October 24th 04 05:18 AM
Non-polarized electrolytic RXJR Equipment 0 October 24th 04 04:31 AM
Non-polarized electrolytic RXJR Equipment 0 October 24th 04 04:31 AM
Circularly Polarized for LPFM J. McLaughlin Antenna 4 July 21st 04 09:58 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:47 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017