Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Kash J. Rangan" wrote in
: Is it advisable to use a combination of Coax and a ladder line to feed a simple horizontal multiband dipole antenna? In my new QTH it would be very easy for me to get a short run of coax out of my shack window but I would like to use a low loss ladder line for the main run up to the antenna feed point. Is it OK to place a 4:1 balun just outside of the window for the transition? If your antenna is balanced, it would probably be better to simply split the ladder line onto the center conducters of two identical short coaxes and then run ladder line inside to your tuner. If you MUST ground the shields that's OK and you can use lightning arrestors on both coaxes. But remember, no lighning arrestor is as good for protecting equipment as a foot or two of air. Disconnecting during thunderstorms is solid policy! -- Dave Oldridge+ ICQ 454777283 |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Oldridge" wrote in message 0... "Kash J. Rangan" wrote in : Is it advisable to use a combination of Coax and a ladder line to feed a simple horizontal multiband dipole antenna? In my new QTH it would be very easy for me to get a short run of coax out of my shack window but I would like to use a low loss ladder line for the main run up to the antenna feed point. Is it OK to place a 4:1 balun just outside of the window for the transition? If your antenna is balanced, it would probably be better to simply split the ladder line onto the center conducters of two identical short coaxes and then run ladder line inside to your tuner. If you MUST ground the shields that's OK and you can use lightning arrestors on both coaxes. But remember, no lighning arrestor is as good for protecting equipment as a foot or two of air. Disconnecting during thunderstorms is solid policy! -- Dave Oldridge+ ICQ 454777283 Sounds a little backwards. The Ladder Line should transition to coax (balanced as you pointed out) inside to hopefully reduce RF in the shack. An arrestor outside in addition to disconnecting from equipment will avoid arcing in the shack at least. You have to be there to even remember to disconnect. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Oldridge wrote:
"Kash J. Rangan" wrote in If your antenna is balanced, it would probably be better to simply split the ladder line onto the center conducters of two identical short coaxes and then run ladder line inside to your tuner. If you MUST ground the shields that's OK and you can use lightning arrestors on both coaxes. But remember, no lighning arrestor is as good for protecting equipment as a foot or two of air. Disconnecting during thunderstorms is solid policy! If you have a direct hit, a one foot air gap isn't necessarily going to do you much good, unless the antenna end of the gap is on the ground surface. (i.e. the wire going from where the coax ends to your lightning dissipation ground has some non-zero inductance/resistance) If you're worried about induced voltages from adjacent strikes, then a good transient suppressor will help, but almost all suppressors have "let through" voltage that is above the damage threshold for, say, a FET front end. Depends on what your equipment sensitivity is. Shorting the input of the radio and tying it to chassis ground.. that WILL protect the radio. |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jim Lux wrote in
: Dave Oldridge wrote: "Kash J. Rangan" wrote in If your antenna is balanced, it would probably be better to simply split the ladder line onto the center conducters of two identical short coaxes and then run ladder line inside to your tuner. If you MUST ground the shields that's OK and you can use lightning arrestors on both coaxes. But remember, no lighning arrestor is as good for protecting equipment as a foot or two of air. Disconnecting during thunderstorms is solid policy! If you have a direct hit, a one foot air gap isn't necessarily going to do you much good, unless the antenna end of the gap is on the ground surface. (i.e. the wire going from where the coax ends to your lightning dissipation ground has some non-zero inductance/resistance) If you're worried about induced voltages from adjacent strikes, then a good transient suppressor will help, but almost all suppressors have "let through" voltage that is above the damage threshold for, say, a FET front end. Depends on what your equipment sensitivity is. Shorting the input of the radio and tying it to chassis ground.. that WILL protect the radio. I have been through some VERY violent storms. I always disconnected all antenna and power leads from the radio. Outside arrestors will help keep it out of the house but you need airspace to protect receiver front ends. Also disconnect any ethernet runs. Surge protection can only do so much. I learned the hard way about disconnecting stuff. My neighbour across the street had a direct hit and it danced across the phone lines into my equipment. I lost several modems, a couple of ethernet cards and a monitor and considered myself lucky that none of the computers was totalled. But my radios were disconnected and unscathed. Now the coast station I worked for had a direct hit on our Nautel 500khz transmitter's tower. Blew out half the solid state final modules but the damn thing kept right on ticking on the others! -- Dave Oldridge+ ICQ 454777283 VA7CZ |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() MUST ground the shields that's OK and you can use lightning arrestors on both coaxes. This is probably not going to work in most cases. Remember an open wire feedline can have rather high voltages on it compared to a matched coax liine. This is because they are often mismatched at the antenna. If a voltage peak should happen to occur at the place where you have the arrestor, it can fire the gas tube because of the rf voltage. For example, a gas tube arrestor made for legal limit typically has a firing voltage of about 800 volts. In a matched 50 ohm system, even with a full 1500 watts into 50 ohms the peak rf voltage is in the neighborhood of 600 volts. But even a moderate power into a high impedance open line could be enough to fire the gas tubes. Neither the transmitter nor the gas tube would be happy with this situation. Rick K2XT |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Rick" wrote in
: MUST ground the shields that's OK and you can use lightning arrestors on both coaxes. This is probably not going to work in most cases. Remember an open wire feedline can have rather high voltages on it compared to a matched coax liine. This is because they are often mismatched at the antenna. If a voltage peak should happen to occur at the place where you have the arrestor, it can fire the gas tube because of the rf voltage. For example, a gas tube arrestor made for legal limit typically has a firing voltage of about 800 volts. In a matched 50 ohm system, even with a full 1500 watts into 50 ohms the peak rf voltage is in the neighborhood of 600 volts. But even a moderate power into a high impedance open line could be enough to fire the gas tubes. Neither the transmitter nor the gas tube would be happy with this situation. That's true. You would probably need air-gap arrestors that can be adjusted to not arc on normal transmitted voltages. Still, the only really effective way of feeding a non-trap wire system on several bands that I've encountered is to use open wire. -- Dave Oldridge+ ICQ 454777283 |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Dave Oldridge wrote: That's true. You would probably need air-gap arrestors that can be adjusted to not arc on normal transmitted voltages. Still, the only really effective way of feeding a non-trap wire system on several bands that I've encountered is to use open wire. -- Dave Oldridge+ ICQ 454777283 One of the best "air-gap arrestors" of the home-brew variety I have seen, was made with a couple of Wide Gapped Spark-Plugs, threaded into a 1/4 Steel Plate that was bonded to a very deep Grounding System. The fellow used GTO15000 to connect the spark-plugs to the Wire-Feeders. Worked very well....... -- Bruce in alaska add path after fast to reply |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|