Reg

Yanks started on snake oil in the old west and can't break the habit. I'm a
Canuck and didn't get as exposed! But a little more info would be
appreciated. Also I'm wondering if the angle of the dangle on the Isotron
is important, hi..hi..
73
Hank WD5JFR
"Reg Edwards" wrote in message
...
The theory has been worked out for the last 100 years and your Isotron
will
work exactly as the theory predicts.

Radiated power will be about 1 watt and the antenna itself will glow in
the
dark.

I'm surprised you backward Yanks still believe sales blurbs. In Europe we
have what are known as "The Trades Description Acts" (Of parliament).
----
Reg.

UK Trade Description Act, 1968.

It is an offence for a trader to apply a false or misleading description to
goods. (Note it is the trader, not the manufacturer, who is involved.)

All goods are covered except houses.

The local (the Council) Trading Standard Authorities are under a statutary
duty to enforce the act. The local Trading Standards Officer has powers of
entry, inspection and seizure of goods.

It is not the job of the Authority to obtain compensation for the offence
but to take steps necessary to prevent others from being deceived such as
confiscation of goods from shops.

It is up to the purchaser to take action in the civil courts for
compensation. With the support of the Authority he will very likely succeed.

But for the sake of a falsely-described, $10, second-hand radio antenna is
it worth the trouble?

The Trading Standards Officer would have to engage the services of
consultant radio engineers to conduct prolonged and expensive field trials
in order to prove the point.

A court of law would not accept a mere statement of Maxwells equations or
any of Terman's or Kraus's learned dissertations. A bewigged judge, of
course, would be well advised to seek the opinions to be found on this
newsgroup.
----
Reg, G4FGQ

I've just had a look in Google at the manufacturer's so-called specification
for the Isotron.

Very carefully, nothing is said which could cause dispute.

But there's no mention of by-far the most important characteristic -
radiating efficiency!

There's no law against NOT mentioning anything. This is precisely where the
manufacturer/trader has the advantage over a prospective gullible ignorant
customer.

Quality is a measure of conformance to the intended (as specified and
agreed) purpose.

If a buyer with a fistful of cash doesn't know what he wants he can't
complain if he doesn't get it.
----
Reg.

Reg Edwards wrote:

I've just had a look in Google at the manufacturer's so-called specification
for the Isotron.

Very carefully, nothing is said which could cause dispute.

But there's no mention of by-far the most important characteristic -
radiating efficiency!

There's no law against NOT mentioning anything. This is precisely where the
manufacturer/trader has the advantage over a prospective gullible ignorant
customer.


Unfortunately, the enthusiastic ham, most of whom have only a rudimentary
knowledge of antennas, is always looking for something that will help him
get his signal out. It is not so much that he is gullible or ignorant, but
desires to get his signal on the air in the easiest way possible. I've been
hamming since 58, spent my whole navy career in communications and electronics,
and after retiring became a journeyman technician -- and I am often tempted
to try some of these gadgets. Thanks to rec.radio.amateur.antenna I have
learned enough to know what is worth trying, and what is not.

Irv VE6BP




--
--------------------------------------
Diagnosed Type II Diabetes March 5 2001
Beating it with diet and exercise!
297/215/210 (to be revised lower)
58"/43"(!)/44" (already lower too!)
--------------------------------------
Visit my HomePage at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv/
Visit my very special website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv4/
Visit my CFSRS/CFIOG ONLINE OLDTIMERS website at http://members.shaw.ca/finkirv5/
--------------------
Irv Finkleman,
Grampa/Ex-Navy/Old Fart/Ham Radio VE6BP
Calgary, Alberta, Canada