| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
I have just had a look at the RigExpert site. Look impressive, but the MFJ269 at about $400US was about my limit. I think I will take a step back and conduct a more scientific review of all of the antenna analyzers on offer, there for you should get sick of my postings over the next couple of weeks/months. I must say that the ability to save and analyze data on the lap top is an appealing feature. Peter, It helps to identify what you really need from the instrument. The difficulty in doing that is foreseeing where an unstructured learning journey might take you. You will tend to arrive a points where you want to measure something just beyond your existing capability. If the quest is for pure learning, then just concentrate on the things that are within scope, and enjoy the learning. I admit that it is a bit of an old world view of ham radio, that it is quintessentially a technical learning activity... but call me a dinasour. The resolution of sign with the '259B is not a show stopper, but it is a convenience issue and in the hands of a person with inadequate knowledge, it is potentially misleading. TLLC (http://www.vk1od.net/calc/tl/tllc.php) can refer impedance made at one point on a known transmission line (eg the tx end) to another point (eg the load end). Of course, uncertainty of the TL parameters contributes to measurement uncertainty. This technique is ok for one off measurements, but would be very labour intensive for a sweep with hundreds of observations. The ability to calibrate the feedline 'fixture' as part of a VNA measurement system provides the convenience of measurement referred to your preferred reference plan. The AIM4170 is (as I understand it) half of a VNA, but that should be enough to do the same thing. So, for the advantages of the ham grade VNA over the MFJ259B, you pay more money, get better measurement resolution (the AD converters have better resolution than the MFJ259B), have capability for automation of measurement referred to a convenient reference plane, but... you lose portability... though there is no reason why a ham grade VNA with a basic display system couldn't be portable. Owen Owen I would never call you a dinasour or should I say from one dinasour to another! I agree with your sentiments entirely of ham radio being a technical learning activity. For me the outlay for any antenna analyzer is significant, but I'm prepared to pay a bit for the instrument that covers foreseeable needs, but that will be as you say will cater for measurements just beyond my current capability. Let the evaluation continue. Regards Peter |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| antenna analyzer | Swap | |||
| FS MFJ 259 Antenna Analyzer | Swap | |||
| Antenna analyzer? | Antenna | |||
| FS: MFJ-249 Antenna Analyzer | Swap | |||
| WTB: Antenna Analyzer | Swap | |||