Dale,
You should know better than that. Asking Art to prove something? You
gotta be kidding.
- 'Doc

On Sep 2, 6:24*pm, "'Doc" wrote:
Dale,
You should know better than that. *Asking Art to prove something? *You
gotta be kidding.
*- 'Doc

And why not? This is a discussion group. Any one can concur or
challenge
the statement. If I supply the proof of anything then silly attacks
begin
I can handle them but it does not improve on my knoweledge.
I will state right now that overall size or straightness of a radiator
is not
implied in Maxwell's laws in any way. So I would like to know where
that notion came from.
Is that so bad?
So Doctor, what have you got to offer regarding radiator straightness
as a person skilled in the art ?

On Sep 2, 7:54*pm, Art Unwin wrote:
On Sep 2, 6:24*pm, "'Doc" wrote:

Dale,
You should know better than that. *Asking Art to prove something? *You
gotta be kidding.
*- 'Doc

And why not? This is a discussion group. Any one can concur or
challenge
the statement. If I supply the proof of anything then silly attacks
begin
I can handle them but it does not improve on my knoweledge.
I will state right now that overall size or straightness of a radiator
is not
implied in Maxwell's laws in any way. So I would like to know where
that notion came from.
Is that so bad?
So Doctor, what have you got to offer regarding radiator straightness
as a person skilled in the art ?

Art, you already conceded to an exercise in futility that was a very
good example of a bent antenna in its worst case. You would think you
would have learned your lesson.

Jimmie