Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Szczepan Białek" wrote in message ... "Dave Platt" wrote ... In article , Jeff Liebermann wrote: I forgot to connect my comments to the original question. Sorry(tm). You're correct. There's no way to get a good isotropic radiator pattern with a simple vertical radiator. However, you can still get fairly close if you make the antenna sufficiently small relative to the operating wavelength. As the physical antenna size approaches a point radiator, the pattern starts to look rather spherical. The difference in pattern between a half-wavelength dipole, and an infinitesimally-short dipole (i.e. one whose length approaches a point source) is actually quite small. A dipole is always the two monopoles and never a point source. Only monopole is a point source. S* Nonsense. Only a point can be a point source. The principle of the infinitesimal electric doublet is the hypothetical result of making the lengths of the elements of a balanced dipole vanishingly small. This is useful to quantify the characteristics of the limiting case but, because of its inherent axial symmetry, it still has the form of a dipole and the same kind of radiation pattern with linear polarisation and no radiation in the directions aligned with the ends of the dipole (for the reason I gave earlier in this thread). Monopole antennas are developed from dipoles by substituting one of the elements, often using a 'reflection' of the remaining element in a ground plane. Their characteristics are different from those of the parent dipole because of this substitution but they still have the same kind of axially-symmetric radiation pattern, with linear polarisation and no radiation in the direction of the end of the monopole. A point source is a hypothetical 'device' that radiates equally in all directions. Obviously this could not be realised using a monopole because that would provide the wrong radiation pattern. A polarisation can be assigned to a point source, for the sake of comparison with real antennas (which is how the point source is used), just as a point source can be considered as transmitting or receiving a signal - but that doesn't mean a physical antenna can be made that has the same characteristics, that can be made to transmit or receive. Chris |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "christofire" wrote ... "Szczepan Białek" wrote in message ... A dipole is always the two monopoles and never a point source. Only monopole is a point source. S* Nonsense. Only a point can be a point source. Yes. Monopole made of wire is not a point source. For this reason inventors mounted something lake a ball on the end. The principle of the infinitesimal electric doublet is the hypothetical result of making the lengths of the elements of a balanced dipole vanishingly small. This is useful to quantify the characteristics of the limiting case but, because of its inherent axial symmetry, it still has the form of a dipole and the same kind of radiation pattern with linear polarisation and no radiation in the directions aligned with the ends of the dipole (for the reason I gave earlier in this thread). Each todays dipole consist of the two monopoles in opposite phase. There are the two seperate sources. They produce the two spherical waves. You say they are polarised - I that they are coupled. Monopole antennas are developed from dipoles by substituting one of the elements, often using a 'reflection' of the remaining element in a ground plane. Their characteristics are different from those of the parent dipole because of this substitution but they still have the same kind of axially-symmetric radiation pattern, with linear polarisation and no radiation in the direction of the end of the monopole. A point source is a hypothetical 'device' that radiates equally in all directions. Obviously this could not be realised using a monopole because that would provide the wrong radiation pattern. A polarisation can be assigned to a point source, for the sake of comparison with real antennas (which is how the point source is used), just as a point source can be considered as transmitting or receiving a signal - but that doesn't mean a physical antenna can be made that has the same characteristics, that can be made to transmit or receive. Equipment is polarized - not waves. Point sorce cannot be polarised. The two monopoles are always polarized. Long wire without big tip is pseudo-polarized. S* |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Force 12 - C3S | Antenna | |||
Air Force 1 | Shortwave | |||
Air Force One | Shortwave | |||
FS: Force 12 | Swap | |||
Force 12 C-4 | Antenna |