Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Art Unwin" wrote in message ... Years of discussion on this same subject has been a matter of lies, misinterpretations and a determination to obstruct change. All of these discussion rest on a statement made years ago which has since gone on to many tangential discussions based on untruths. The original statement, made by me was: "If you add a time varying field to the laws of Statics by Gauss the mathematic results are in full conformance with Maxwells laws" my statement still stands. Gauss's law IS one of Maxwell's four equations, and it doesn't need you adding a (t) to it to make it work any better than it has for the last hundred years or so. The basis is that Gauss's law is independent of time, so it is true AT ANY TIME, it doesn't need a time parameter to make it work. if you really want to you can add a (t) on both sides of the equation, but it won't change anything, it just clutters up the notation. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Gaussian law of statatics extended by adding a time vary field | Antenna | |||
Gaussian law and time varying fields | Antenna | |||
Question for Field Day - extended ops battery pack | Equipment | |||
Question for Field Day - extended ops battery pack | Equipment | |||
Field hookup Extended local | Swap |