On Oct 2, 9:02*pm, tom wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:
On Oct 2, 6:33 pm, buzz wrote:
Art Unwin wrote:

SNIPED *spelling curtsy Art

Elermentry explanation of the weak force in the Standard model
(Patents applied for)
Art
Art
Since all the strands are connected together, the entire things just
looks like one flat piece of metal. Snake oil spin.

And what is the MFJ259B measuring when it denotes a resonant frequency?

What did the instrument say exactly? *Or is that covered by your patent?

What leads you to believe that it indicated rezonunz?

And if it did, why would you think that helps confirm your nonsensical
view of the world?

tom
K0TAR

You really make yourself look so stupid with questions like that. Or
maybe I should say "so dumb?" You "may" have made it out of high
school "may", but for evidence of higher education you could get a
diploma from a Honduras University for just pennies. Probably sent off
a postcard for one with a Honduras postage stamp on it just to impress
them.

Art Unwin wrote:
On Oct 2, 9:02 pm, tom wrote:
snip

What leads you to believe that it indicated rezonunz?

And if it did, why would you think that helps confirm your nonsensical
view of the world?

tom
K0TAR

You really make yourself look so stupid with questions like that. Or
maybe I should say "so dumb?" You "may" have made it out of high
school "may", but for evidence of higher education you could get a
diploma from a Honduras University for just pennies. Probably sent off
a postcard for one with a Honduras postage stamp on it just to impress
them.

When I've made claims, I've generally associated numbers with them. If
someone should challenge me on one, I would respond to them with where
the number came from. We could then have a discussion about it, and if
it ended up on this group, others would get to make cogent and lively
comments.

And hopefully some would learn from some who knew. And those who
presented verifiable evidence would be acknowledged by those that didn't
have it. And some would disagree on nothing but fact, and some would
disagree just for the hell of it. And so on.

But there is a consensus on what works and why. The disagreements are
pretty much on just the fine points and about 80% because the OFs in
question like to do it and have the time. At least it appears that way.
I'm not bothered by it, and I think most of the regulars aren't
either. And some of it is quite amusing. The next button isn't hard to
click.

Which leads to me saying, Art, ssppppssssppppspsspspspspsp!

tom
K0TAR