In what area are you refering to when wanting a small antenna.

In the areas that I use antennas, that is, in, ham and cb, there are lots
of big, medium and small antennas available.

If in the tv reception area there are also lots of choices, depending on the
distance you are from a tv transmitter.

Where and what do you want and maybe someone will have an answer for you.

Lots of luck,

Rollie wrote:
In what area are you refering to when wanting a small antenna.

In the areas that I use antennas, that is, in, ham and cb, there are lots
of big, medium and small antennas available.

If in the tv reception area there are also lots of choices, depending on the
distance you are from a tv transmitter.

Where and what do you want and maybe someone will have an answer for you.

Lots of luck,



Well, there has always been the "Texas Bugcatcher" (and, Cecil owned one
of these, I can tell, he still has the coil laying around ;-)
chuckle), but the "bugs" always left a bad taste in my mouth -- to
some extent the DLM (google "Robert Vincent" and "Distributed Load
Monopole" for more information) improves upon that, and to a larger
degree than I expected!

However, some claim that is only "in my imagination." satisfying-grin

Regards,
JS

On Sep 15, 4:07*pm, John Smith wrote: I
love little pee pees MY pee pee is little just loike my little brain.
Will you show me your pee pee if I show you mine?

John Smith wrote:
On Sep 15, 4:07 pm, John Smith wrote: I
love little pee pees MY pee pee is little just loike my little brain.
Will you show me your pee pee if I show you mine?



Yanno', I really hate plonking "John Smith" and not being able to review
my own posts -- but, I guess I can live with that ... ROFLOL

Oh yeah, PLONKERS!

JS

On Sep 15, 7:16*pm, John Smith wrote:
John Smith wrote:
On Sep 15, 4:07 pm, John Smith wrote: I
love little pee pees MY pee pee is little just loike my little brain.
Will you show me your pee pee if I show you mine?

Yanno', I really hate plonking "John Smith" and not being able to review
my own posts -- but, I guess I can live with that ... ROFLOL

Oh yeah, PLONKERS!

JS

If you ever learn how I can plonk you from this Google web interface,
please let me know. Thanks.

wrote:

...
If you ever learn how I can plonk you from this Google web interface,
please let me know. Thanks.

You could always go screw yourself ... you will be so busy you will not
have time to gripe! ROFLOL

Regards,
JS

John Smith wrote:
wrote:

...
If you ever learn how I can plonk you from this Google web interface,
please let me know. Thanks.

You could always go screw yourself ... you will be so busy you will not
have time to gripe! ROFLOL

Regards,
JS

Actually, I should explain that, as my words just sound too callous. My
mistake, just attempting to meet the discussion/post with all the
considerations due them/it ...

It is hard to have respect for someone who uses google groups for longer
than a couple/few weeks and then gripes about it ... there are still
plenty of free news servers and a whole slew of news readers available
to allow you freedom of choice in what and who you read.

If someone does not have the technical abilities to setup/use a decent
news reader, how can you expect them capable of other technical
abilities? At least, that question always pops up in my mind.

Regards,
JS

On Sep 16, 1:00*am, John Smith wrote:
wrote:
...
If you ever learn how I can plonk you from this Google web interface,
please let me know. Thanks.

You could always go screw yourself ... you will be so busy you will not
have time to gripe! *ROFLOL

Regards,
JS

John, I keep requesting that you keep those kinds of fantasies to
yourself. If you continue I will complain to gmail.

On Sep 16, 2:38*am, John Smith wrote:
John Smith wrote:
wrote:

...
If you ever learn how I can plonk you from this Google web interface,
please let me know. Thanks.

You could always go screw yourself ... you will be so busy you will not
have time to gripe! *ROFLOL

Regards,
JS

Actually, I should explain that, as my words just sound too callous. *My
mistake, just attempting to meet the discussion/post with all the
considerations due them/it ...

It is hard to have respect for someone who uses google groups for longer
than a couple/few weeks and then gripes about it ... there are still
plenty of free news servers and a whole slew of news readers available
to allow you freedom of choice in what and who you read.

If someone does not have the technical abilities to setup/use a decent
news reader, how can you expect them capable of other technical
abilities? *At least, that question always pops up in my mind.

Regards,
JS

If I choose not to expend the time and effort, then it is a matter of
posting or not posting when choosing the web interface. Sure there are
plenty of free news servers and no need to use a free news reader
since outlook express works fine, John. I will not go to throuble of
locating a free news server just to plonk you. But I will do it from
the web interface if at all possible.

wrote:

...
If I choose not to expend the time and effort, then it is a matter of
posting or not posting when choosing the web interface. Sure there are
plenty of free news servers and no need to use a free news reader
since outlook express works fine, John. I will not go to throuble of
locating a free news server just to plonk you. But I will do it from
the web interface if at all possible.

Frankly, that all leaves me but one response, "Ignorant, lazy b*st*rd!"

But then, I wouldn't say it in public ... ;-)

JS