Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() . Wet trees can also absorb radio waves better then dry ones. Trees have vascular systems so are "wet" all the time. Dry trees are dead trees, http://www.biology4kids.com/files/pl...lemphloem.html |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill wrote:
. Wet trees can also absorb radio waves better then dry ones. Trees have vascular systems so are "wet" all the time. Dry trees are dead trees, http://www.biology4kids.com/files/pl...lemphloem.html You must live where it never freezes. The difference between summer and winter on 2m and up is certainly noticeable and measurable here in Minnesota. tom K0TAR |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 26, 8:19*am, tom wrote:
Bill wrote: . Wet trees can also absorb radio waves better then dry ones. Trees have vascular systems so are "wet" all the time. Dry trees are dead trees, http://www.biology4kids.com/files/pl...lemphloem.html You must live where it never freezes. The original question had to do with rain, did it not? Not ice. * The difference between summer and winter on 2m and up is certainly noticeable and measurable here in Minnesota. tom K0TAR And the difference is attributed to what? |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill wrote:
On Oct 26, 8:19 am, tom wrote: Bill wrote: . Wet trees can also absorb radio waves better then dry ones. Trees have vascular systems so are "wet" all the time. Dry trees are dead trees, http://www.biology4kids.com/files/pl...lemphloem.html You must live where it never freezes. The original question had to do with rain, did it not? Not ice. I was responding to "wet" versus "dead". The difference between summer and winter on 2m and up is certainly noticeable and measurable here in Minnesota. And the difference is attributed to what? Very very simple physics. tom K0TAR |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 26, 10:40*pm, tom wrote:
Bill wrote: On Oct 26, 8:19 am, tom wrote: Bill wrote: . Wet trees can also absorb radio waves better then dry ones. Trees have vascular systems so are "wet" all the time. Dry trees are dead trees, http://www.biology4kids.com/files/pl...lemphloem.html You must live where it never freezes. The original question had to do with rain, did it not? Not ice. I was responding to "wet" versus "dead". * The difference between summer and winter on 2m and up is certainly noticeable and measurable here in Minnesota. And the difference is attributed to what? Very very simple physics. tom K0TAR I get it. You are Art today. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill wrote:
. Wet trees can also absorb radio waves better then dry ones. Trees have vascular systems so are "wet" all the time. Dry trees are dead trees, http://www.biology4kids.com/files/pl...lemphloem.html Oops, forgot to say that water, even with the contaminants of life in it, doesn't conduct very well when frozen. tom K0TAR |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Oct 26, 8:35*am, tom wrote:
Bill wrote: . Wet trees can also absorb radio waves better then dry ones. Trees have vascular systems so are "wet" all the time. Dry trees are dead trees, http://www.biology4kids.com/files/pl...lemphloem.html Oops, forgot to say that water, even with the contaminants of life in it, doesn't conduct very well when frozen. tom K0TAR The original question had to do with interference with radio reception, not with conduction. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill wrote:
On Oct 26, 8:35 am, tom wrote: Bill wrote: . Wet trees can also absorb radio waves better then dry ones. Trees have vascular systems so are "wet" all the time. Dry trees are dead trees, http://www.biology4kids.com/files/pl...lemphloem.html Oops, forgot to say that water, even with the contaminants of life in it, doesn't conduct very well when frozen. tom K0TAR The original question had to do with interference with radio reception, not with conduction. What planet do you live on? Interference had nothing to do with the discussion. Conduction of objects in the local environment has everything to do with reception. tom K0TAR |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
tom wrote:
Conduction of objects in the local environment has everything to do with reception. Should have said conductivity. tom K0TAR |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Bill wrote:
On Oct 26, 8:35 am, tom wrote: Bill wrote: . Wet trees can also absorb radio waves better then dry ones. Trees have vascular systems so are "wet" all the time. Dry trees are dead trees, http://www.biology4kids.com/files/pl...lemphloem.html Oops, forgot to say that water, even with the contaminants of life in it, doesn't conduct very well when frozen. tom K0TAR The original question had to do with interference with radio reception, not with conduction. Your license is new in August this year. And tied to a canceled callsign in 1999. Odd history. tom K0TAR |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|