LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2   Report Post  
Old December 29th 09, 11:53 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Oct 2009
Posts: 85
Default Science update,particle wave duality

On Dec 29, 2:36*am, Art Unwin wrote:
Gauss's boundary contains static particles


not in YOUR world where you have added a time dependency to his law.


Faraday cage contains static particles


Faraday doesn't care about particles


Both have a boundary that is conductive and thus can radiate.

Both radiate when a time varying field is applied


both have a boundry, this is true. Faraday cages are conductive and
could radiate if properly excited. But gaussian surfaces are
conceptual and have not physical manifestation so can not be
conductive nor radiate, though radiative fields could pass through
them.


Both receive when transformed into a time varying field
provided when the magnetic and electric moves to cancellation


I have no idea what this means.


Both are applicable to Maxwell's equations for radiation


Gaussian surfaces are part of maxwell's equations by his inclusion of
Gauss's law. the Faraday cage is a result of the effects of maxwell's
equations in a practical application.


Both start and finish with a time varient current.

Both produce a charge by accelerating or removal of a charge via
deceleration of a particle.


Only after YOU add the time factor to Gauss's law.



The accelerant in both cases is the intersection of two closed fields.
( Electric field and a static field encircled by
the displacement current)


I would like to see how you encircle a static field (which by
definition must be infinite in extent) by a displacement current.


In both cases the particle has a straight line projection with spin

In both cases the particle vector angles equate exactly with that of
gravity and the Earth's rotation


right, maybe in your twisted world.


Question * *;
How does the particle ( singular) referred to in each case act like a
wave or become a wave as stated in Classical Physics?


its all a matter of perspective. quite simple in fact so i'll leave
it as an exercise for the student...
show your work, papers due by 9am tomorrow.
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Partical and Wave duality explained N9OGL Policy 51 March 15th 06 05:42 PM
Partical and Wave duality explained Ron Hardin General 8 March 15th 06 04:28 AM
Partical and Wave duality explained Ron Hardin Policy 8 March 15th 06 04:28 AM
Partical and Wave duality explained N9OGL General 43 March 15th 06 04:28 AM
Partical and Wave duality explained Jim Hampton General 0 March 3rd 06 02:26 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:04 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017