Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mar 24, 2:22*am, tom wrote:
On 3/23/2010 7:20 PM, Art Unwin wrote: your whole concept is malformed. *if the 'static particles' are in 'equilibrium' (i.e. not moving) and then you add a time varying field Equilibrium does not mean not moving. I won't go any deeper since you have problems with things complex and go into babble mode when confronted with them. tom K0TAR oh, so you understand art's concept of 'static' and 'equilibrium' enough to argue that side of it?? how do you 'equilibrium' and 'static particles' unless they aren't moving? equations please, show your work, extra points for deriving how his magical levitating diamagnetic neutrino fits into the equations. please, we need someone who can fill in the gaps that art can't seem to do. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Polarized radiation | Antenna | |||
Skin Thickness, RF penetration into conductors. | Shortwave | |||
UHF penetration & path loss Q: | Antenna | |||
Electromagnetic radiation | Shortwave | |||
TWTHED'S SPHINCTER POPS FROM STRESS OF GAY PENETRATION | CB |