Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
|
|||
|
|||
What to use for an underground transponder?
Geoffrey S. Mendelson wrote:
Roy Lewallen wrote: Attenuation through the ground depends on the soil conductivity and dielectric constant, and the frequency. Here's the attenuation in dB/ft for two ground types and a number of frequencies: Freq MHz Avg soil(1) Vy good soil(2) 0.01 0.037 0.091 0.1 0.12 0.29 1 0.35 0.90 10 0.66 2.4 100 0.69 3.3 10,000 0.69 3.4 So if I get this right, a 2.4gHz signal in normal soil would be anttenuated 6.9 db (less than 2 "S units). In very good soil, it would be anttenuated around 34 db, which would make it difficult to receive. Those dB values are correct for 10 feet of homogeneous soil. Real soil is stratified, and reflections from layer boundaries could have some pretty profound effects. 6.9 dB is from 2 to 4 "S-Units" on my Icom, depending on where on the S meter scale it is. A Pringles can antenna has a gain of about 18db, that would certainly be enough for average soil, and might be good enough for very good soil. Relative to what? According to this site http://www.turnpoint.net/wireless/has.html, a Pringles can antenna showed about the same gain as a Lucent omnidirectional antenna. Of course, an 18 dB error is only a mis-estimation of power density by a factor of 1,000,000,000,000,000,000. Pah, piddly nit-picking details. You could make it up by increasing the power by the same factor. It also has the advantage of possibly being a 2 way link. A reliable one would take some calculation, planning, and a realistic idea of antenna performance. Roy Lewallen, W7EL |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Underground antenna | Antenna | |||
FA: Rare "Eureka" Radar Transponder AN/PPN-1A | Boatanchors | |||
Underground Bases | Shortwave | |||
Underground antennas | Shortwave | |||
ladderline underground?? | Antenna |