On Fri, 11 Jun 2010 20:31:42 GMT, Owen Duffy wrote:

there is a proposition that a transmitter "designed/adjusted
for, and expecting a 50 + j 0 ohm load" can be well represented by a
Thevenin equivalent circuit and naturally has Zeq=50+j0. However, that
proposition is easily proven wrong by valid experiments in the real
world

Using the same transmitter originally "designed/adjusted
for, and expecting a 50 + j 0 ohm load"?

I don't suppose this anecdote has any data behind it, does it?

The easy proof has yet to wrong Walt's proposition - or did he state
something to the contrary my reading that he represented a Thevenin
equivalent circuit in the first two steps of his recent report?

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC