Grounding for Gable end bracket & mast.
 

"Szczepan Bia?ek" wrote:

wrote ...
Szczepan Bialek wrote:

Nikola Tesla wrote: " I showed that the universal medium is a gaseous
body
in which only longitudinal pulses can be propagated, involving
alternating
compressions and expansions similar to those produced by sound waves in
the
air. Thus, a wireless transmitter does not propagate Hertz waves, which
are
a myth, but sound waves in the ether, behaving in every respect like
those
in the air, except that, owing to the great elastic force and extremely
small density of the medium, their speed is that of light."

And close to 100 years worth of experimental testing say Tesla was wrong,
get
over it.

Tesla like Ampere are not in the teaching program.

Tesla's stuff before he went insane is in the text books and so is Ampere.

Teaching programs are written by Ministry of Education.
Not all is in the teaching programs.

Insane babble.

snip remaing insane babble


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Grounding for Gable end bracket & mast.
 

"K1TTT" wrote
...
On Aug 7, 7:44 am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:


In our textbooks is wrote "whats a pity that to teaching was choosen
Heaviside not Ampere".
But Ampere is too sophisticated for students.


Ampere, Gauss, Weber, Maxwell are too difficult for student.

they are not hard they are the basis of teaching modern
electromagnetics.

Electromagnetics is a one form of Electrodynamics. The only form in teaching
program. The others is for selfteaching.
Here are the review: http://www.df.lth.se/~snorkelf/Longitudinal/node4.html

Any introductory electromagnetics course uses their
stuff.

EM made by Heaviside is a simplification of electrodynamics. Teachers choose
it for teaching.

if they are too hard for you that explains why you have all
those strange ideas, you are stuck 100 years ago with outdated over
simplified theories that have been disproved many times.

Ampere's longitudinal force was derived experimentally. So it cannot be
disproved.
Current elements (electrons) repel each others and thanks this the radio
works.
S*

Grounding for Gable end bracket & mast.
 

wrote ...
"Szczepan Bia?ek" wrote:


Tesla like Ampere are not in the teaching program.

Tesla's stuff before he went insane is in the text books and so is Ampere.

Where in teachin program is Ampere's longitudinal force?
S*

Grounding for Gable end bracket & mast.
 

On Aug 8, 7:53*am, "Szczepan Bia³ek" wrote:
....

"Szczepan Bia?ek" wrote:

Tesla like Ampere are not in the teaching program.

Tesla's stuff before he went insane is in the text books and so is Ampere.

Where in teachin program is Ampere's longitudinal force?
S*

just because he is in the books doesn't mean that everything he ever
wrote is correct. much of the early writings of all those guys was
wrong, it isn't until later when they had learned from their mistakes
that the final correct formulas of electromagnetics were agreed on.
for best results read modern textbooks, if you try to sort out all the
dead ends they went down from the early guesses you will need 100
years to figure it all out again.

Grounding for Gable end bracket & mast.
 

Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"K1TTT" wrote
...
On Aug 7, 7:44 am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:


In our textbooks is wrote "whats a pity that to teaching was choosen
Heaviside not Ampere".
But Ampere is too sophisticated for students.


Ampere, Gauss, Weber, Maxwell are too difficult for student.

they are not hard they are the basis of teaching modern
electromagnetics.

Electromagnetics is a one form of Electrodynamics. The only form in teaching
program. The others is for selfteaching.

You have obviously never gone to school and have no idea what is taught
in schools.

Your posts are babbling nonsense.

--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Grounding for Gable end bracket & mast.
 

"Szczepan Bia?ek" wrote:

wrote ...
"Szczepan Bia?ek" wrote:


Tesla like Ampere are not in the teaching program.

Tesla's stuff before he went insane is in the text books and so is Ampere.

Where in teachin program is Ampere's longitudinal force?
S*

Why don't you go to school and find out?


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Grounding for Gable end bracket & mast.
 

"K1TTT" wrote
...
On Aug 8, 7:53 am, "Szczepan Bia³ek" wrote:
...

Tesla like Ampere are not in the teaching program.

Tesla's stuff before he went insane is in the text books and so is
Ampere.

Where in teaching program is Ampere's longitudinal force?
S*

just because he is in the books doesn't mean that everything he ever
wrote is correct. much of the early writings of all those guys was
wrong, it isn't until later when they had learned from their mistakes
that the final correct formulas of electromagnetics were agreed on.

I am not interesting in electromagnetics. It is the hydraulic analogy.

In Ampere electroDYNAMICS no magnetism.

for best results read modern textbooks, if you try to sort out all the
dead ends they went down from the early guesses you will need 100
years to figure it all out again.

The XXI century will be the century of Ampere ElectroDYNAMICS. It is the
common opinion.
S*

Grounding for Gable end bracket & mast.
 

Szczepan Bialek wrote:

"K1TTT" wrote
...
On Aug 8, 7:53 am, "Szczepan Bia?ek" wrote:
...

Tesla like Ampere are not in the teaching program.

Tesla's stuff before he went insane is in the text books and so is
Ampere.

Where in teaching program is Ampere's longitudinal force?
S*

just because he is in the books doesn't mean that everything he ever
wrote is correct. much of the early writings of all those guys was
wrong, it isn't until later when they had learned from their mistakes
that the final correct formulas of electromagnetics were agreed on.

I am not interesting in electromagnetics. It is the hydraulic analogy.

No, it is not, that is babbling nonsense.

In Ampere electroDYNAMICS no magnetism.

for best results read modern textbooks, if you try to sort out all the
dead ends they went down from the early guesses you will need 100
years to figure it all out again.

The XXI century will be the century of Ampere ElectroDYNAMICS. It is the
common opinion.
S*

More babbling nonsense.


--
Jim Pennino

Remove .spam.sux to reply.

Grounding for Gable end bracket & mast.
 

On Aug 8, 6:23*pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
"K1TTT" ...
On Aug 8, 7:53 am, "Szczepan Bia³ek" wrote:

....

Tesla like Ampere are not in the teaching program.

Tesla's stuff before he went insane is in the text books and so is
Ampere.

Where in teaching program is Ampere's longitudinal force?
S*
just because he is in the books doesn't mean that everything he ever

wrote is correct. *much of the early writings of all those guys was
wrong, it isn't until later when they had learned from their mistakes
that the final correct formulas of electromagnetics were agreed on.

I am not interesting in electromagnetics. It is the hydraulic analogy.

In Ampere electroDYNAMICS no magnetism.

for best results read modern textbooks, if you try to sort out all the

dead ends they went down from the early guesses you will need 100
years to figure it all out again.

The XXI century will be the century of Ampere ElectroDYNAMICS. It is the
common opinion.
S*

what good is a theory without magnetism. it obviously doesn't fit the
real world as we know it today. maybe it is your opinion, but its not
anywhere i have heard of. ampere's theory dates from almost 200 years
ago and was the predecessor of electromagnetics, so you seem to have
taken another step backwards, now you are almost 2 centuries out of
date.

Grounding for Gable end bracket & mast.
 

"K1TTT" wrote
...
On Aug 8, 6:23 pm, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:

In Ampere electroDYNAMICS no magnetism.

The XXI century will be the century of Ampere ElectroDYNAMICS. It is the
common opinion.

what good is a theory without magnetism. it obviously doesn't fit the
real world as we know it today. maybe it is your opinion, but its not
anywhere i have heard of.

Gravity force, electrostatic force and magnetic force are the real world for
the most people. But not for scientists.
They know that in the space is the place for the one of them.
So step by step they decrease the number of them.
The first was Aepinus who proved that gravity and electrostatic are the
same.
The last step was made by Ampere who build the artifical magnet - solenoid.
It means that magnetism is an ilussion like gravity. The all forces are
electric.

ampere's theory dates from almost 200 years
ago and was the predecessor of electromagnetics, so you seem to have
taken another step backwards, now you are almost 2 centuries out of
date.

Heaviside was not scientists and he has taken another step backwards to
Poisson's fluids.
He did not understand Maxwell and Stokes.

Teachers must be in "real world" and wait for the end of works on the
Unification of gravity, electricity and magnetism (they are pending).
S*