| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 10/13/10 1:14 PM, Owen Duffy wrote:
Mike wrote in : The big question I have always had regarding the balun was are we reducing performance by eliminating feedline radiation? For a lot of antennas, that may be a big part of the antenna system. Claiming feed line contribution to radiation as a performance factor is usually a specious claim, and more likely to be made by someone with a commercial imperative than a genuine interest in radiation performance. You know, if you can't solve a problem characteristic, call it out as a feature. I don't disagree, but certain antennas - the EH antenna comes to mind, which resemble a tuned circuit on a stick. Get rid of the feed line radiation, and you almost get rid of the whole antenna. But like you say, its a "feature". It's also not good practice. In this case, feed line radiation would usually skew the pattern upwards, not necessarily a desirable feature, probably not desirable in most situations. Not too desirable. Thanks for the clarification. Mine was a general sort of response, not limited to this antenna. - 73 de Mike N3LI - |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| J pole question | Antenna | |||
| J-Pole Antenna Question | Shortwave | |||
| J pole question | Antenna | |||
| ladder line J-pole question | Antenna | |||
| 2 meter tv twin (300ohm) J pole question | Antenna | |||