Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 13:31:48 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote: Richard Clark wrote: All of this is commonplace to a practitioner of the art of Optics and OptoElectronics. And completely irrelevant to the subject of matches in transmission lines. Thus, it is obviously only a nit-picking logical diversion on your part to avoid discussing match points on transmission lines. On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 18:10:52 GMT, Richard Clark wrote: This, then, returns us to the topic of through-glass attachments, their loss, and the contribution of the layers to reflect (a la glare suppression) which you re-introduced to this thread, above. [I will suspend the absurdity of this logic for the moment.] What is the resonant frequency of this adhesive layer: in wavelengths, frequency, or color? I think we can all agree (barring the slipped decimal place) that it is not 2M nor 440 MHz. I will go one step beyond and ask, if this geometry of attachment is variable through curvatures (windshield are always curved) what are the prospects of Newton's Rings offering a variation in that determination? These are all garden variety questions that plague newbies to the art. I gather you have no response to the on-topic question then. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Cellular through glass mounting | Antenna | |||
Best antenna to go through triple-pane glass | Antenna | |||
Larson glass mount question | Antenna | |||
Thru the glass antenna & tinted glass | Antenna | |||
'Gluing' a broken glass antenna insulator. | Antenna |