Richard Clark wrote:

wrote:
Richard Clark wrote:
You are off topic once again. Consult the archive.

On the contrary, the topic is "Through-Glass Antenna/
Ford Taurus". What did you think it was?

On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 18:58:12 GMT, Richard Clark
wrote:

You can't answer my questions about matching so you are forced into an
off-topic logical diversion. I fully understand.
--
73, Cecil, W5DXP



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 17:58:22 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:

Richard Clark wrote:

wrote:
Richard Clark wrote:
You are off topic once again. Consult the archive.

On the contrary, the topic is "Through-Glass Antenna/
Ford Taurus". What did you think it was?

On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 18:58:12 GMT, Richard Clark
wrote:

You can't answer my questions about matching so you are forced into an
off-topic logical diversion. I fully understand.

At least is was logical and you understood.

Richard Clark wrote:

wrote:
You can't answer my questions about matching so you are forced into an
off-topic logical diversion. I fully understand.

At least is was logical and you understood.

Heh, heh, the "logical" in "logical diversion" doesn't mean the
diversion is not illogical.
--
73, Cecil, W5DXP



-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

On Thu, 08 Apr 2004 18:18:22 -0500, Cecil Moore
wrote:
Heh, heh, the "logical" in "logical diversion" doesn't mean the
diversion is not illogical.
Hmm a logical diversion is a statement with three negatives. You have
a talent for doing it the long way.