Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
you wrote:
It isn't the tuner hardware that is going to be a problem, as much as designing the tuning algorithm that drives the hardware. Mark Johnson did a very good job, reverse engineering the stuff that Bill Shield brought west from Motorola Military back in the 70's for the SEA Autotuners. SGC copied the SEA Firmware & Design enbank, for their stuff. The best stuff, was the stuff Collins did for their Military Autotuners. Starting from scratch is going to be a BIG design project. There's a fair amount of moderately recent literature on efficient algorithms for adjusting a tuner. I have a recent paper from Sun and Fidler at Univ of York that looks interesting, but I haven't read it yet. "High Speed Automatic Antenna Tuning Units" IEE Conf on Ant and Prop, 4-7 April 1995, page 218ff |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Motor for remote controlled tuner | Antenna | |||
Motor for remote controlled antenna tuner | Equipment | |||
Kenwood AT-300 remote auto tuner : is it good? | Equipment | |||
Remote antenna/tuner recommendations | Antenna | |||
FA: LDG RT-11 Automatic Antenna Tuner w/remote | Swap |