Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
  #1   Report Post  
Old November 8th 10, 06:44 PM
Junior Member
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2010
Posts: 4
Default

Thanks for all this info. As i'm still just listening, I think I'm starting to understand that all the tuning and matching is somewhat irrelevant to my needs. There is literally nothing for miles where I'll be deploying this and all I really care about is catching the morning weather round up around 7250 kHz and then whatever else I can pick up while sitting fireside. So far the random wire seems like the cheapest and easiest way to go, and maybe even the best all around performer. I figure I'll get a spool of wire and run it at least 4 feet off the ground - is that really all I need to do?! Since thats so easy, I'll probably play with a SUPER long one (500 feet+), and then find the best balance between performance length and convenience. Two more questions before I put it to test:

will if effect the performance if the antenna comes into contact with the ground?

Will I get the same results if I make a 20 foot x 20 foot square and run a huge length of wire along the perimeter at different heights so as not to short but essentially 500 feet of wire run around a shape instead of in a relatively straight line?


Thanks for all your insight.

bmtc

Last edited by Bajamatic : November 8th 10 at 08:40 PM
  #2   Report Post  
Old November 9th 10, 12:17 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default Random wire vs ANLP1

On Mon, 8 Nov 2010 18:44:04 +0000, Bajamatic
wrote:

I'll
probably play with a SUPER long one (500 feet+), and then find the best
balance between performance length and convenience.


Take care to anticipate that this long an antenna may well have to
pointed at (lengthwise) the station you want to receive instead of
pointed broadside to it.

Two more questions
before I put it to test:

will if effect the performance if the antenna comes into contact with
the ground?


Yes - more loss. However, the troops in Desert Storm did it in the
sand dunes; but they were only talking to local operations - not DXing
Andorra.

Will I get the same results if I make a 20 foot x 20 foot square and run
a huge length of wire along the perimeter at different heights so as not
to short but essentially 500 feet of wire run around a shape instead of
in a relatively straight line?


500 feet of wire is not a virture.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #3   Report Post  
Old November 9th 10, 06:19 AM
Junior Member
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2010
Posts: 4
Default

. Thanks for the advice.
  #4   Report Post  
Old November 9th 10, 04:44 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 39
Default Random wire vs ANLP1

While out and about beware of your DC-AC inverter if you have one. If
hear whistles and hum, it might come from your own DC-AC inverter.
All my AC stuff (PC, cell chargers) is strictly inside the car, so
not much noise escapes and even longwave is clear and quiet (I am in
Europe). If you have that problem, move antenna and other electric
stuff away from each other.

The AOR7030 has a high impedance wire antenna input. If you're
really fireside, not easy to beat a random wire, and not even a
terribly long one. I wouldn't bother with more than 30-50'.

Just don't trip in the power cord under the moonlight. That radio
needs external power, 12Vdc from a vehicle is fine.

You'll have great fun, I envy you a bit.

  #5   Report Post  
Old November 9th 10, 05:54 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default Random wire vs ANLP1

On Tue, 9 Nov 2010 08:44:21 -0800 (PST), spamhog
wrote:

The AOR7030 has a high impedance wire antenna input. If you're
really fireside, not easy to beat a random wire, and not even a
terribly long one. I wouldn't bother with more than 30-50'.


To give some context with my own experience "in the wild" of South
Africa Zulu/Natal (actually at a 5 star safari camp), I took the
cheapest digital SW radio I could find at Radio Shack, 20 feet of
wire-wrap wire, and connected an alligator clip to the wire so that I
could then connect the wire to the whip antenna.

Without the wire, reception was limited to the hum-drum of BBC, VOA,
DW - with the wire thrown up over a rafter the number of signals were
considerable. I've always considered it underwhelming to get a
distant station playing an American music program like Lady Gaga when
what I wanted to hear was Fela Kuti.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC


  #6   Report Post  
Old November 10th 10, 12:09 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Sep 2006
Posts: 39
Default Random wire vs ANLP1


*I've always considered it underwhelming to get a
distant station playing an American music program like Lady Gaga when
what I wanted to hear was Fela Kuti.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC



Respect! :-)

  #7   Report Post  
Old November 22nd 10, 08:28 PM
Junior Member
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Nov 2010
Posts: 4
Default

I'll be sure to report back my findings.

Since posting this I've started to wonder if I really need a radio of the 7030 caliber. Thoughts on that? Am i going to find a substantial difference between something like the Grundig sat.750 and the AOR7030? Or even the little g5 portable? Seems like between this I might start to focus more on speaker quality as the reports are that they are all great radios? I'd love to hear what you all think about that idea.
  #8   Report Post  
Old November 23rd 10, 02:27 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,951
Default Random wire vs ANLP1

On Mon, 22 Nov 2010 20:28:52 +0000, Bajamatic
wrote:

as the reports are that they are all
great radios? I'd love to hear what you all think about that idea.


For hearing about how products perform, I put them into Amazon, and
look at the customer reviews, and pay attention to the ones yelling
MURDER!

For some products, those folks are lost at sea and asking for table
napkins - or they are dead-on. Very easy to differentiate. When I
looked at those complaining of Grundig quality, they sounded
knowledgeable for some things, and hyper-sensitive about other things.

Amazon doesn't sell my Radio Shack 20-125, but it, too, finds web
sites that offer a spread of reviews where, again, I look at the ones
yelling MURDER! When I encounter one complaining that there was no
tuning knob, I have to wonder. This sucker cost me $40, and I could
easily see that feature missing before I pushed the credit card across
the display case. Others complain of lack of sensitivity (I saw no
evidence of them using anything but the whip). I've already heard
more African stations in a day on my RS20-125 than they will in a
lifetime on theirs - unless they go to Africa like I did. Another
complains of bandwidth - c'mon, it is a consumer radio, not a
communications receiver.

And then there is the class of disgruntled customer who grumbles about
the poor fit of controls made by Chinese sources. They can find these
problems with any product.

Being the type to expand upon this kind of grief, I would suspect from
the from all comments considered that Grundig put a RS 20-125 inside
their magnificent case which, perhaps, suffered some fit and feel
problems (being Chinese made, after all - give me a break! Do they
think they are Swiss Watches?). With a price ratio of 7:1, is that
magnificent case something you need?

At the end of the day, you really need to visit the show room floor,
look at the various models to appreciate how they are going to fit
into your lifestyle - and then take them for a test drive. That is,
put them on a known antenna, at the usual listening time, and listen.

73's
Richard Clark, KB7QHC
  #9   Report Post  
Old November 24th 10, 02:12 AM posted to rec.radio.amateur.antenna
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Jul 2006
Posts: 757
Default Random wire vs ANLP1

On Nov 22, 2:28*pm, Bajamatic
wrote:
I'll be sure to report back my findings.

Since posting this I've started to wonder if I really need a radio of
the 7030 caliber. Thoughts on that? *Am i going to find a substantial
difference between something like the Grundig sat.750 and the AOR7030?
Or even the little g5 portable? *Seems like between this I might start
to focus more on speaker quality as the reports are that they are all
great radios? *I'd love to hear what you all think about that idea.

--
Bajamatic


Depends what you are listening to. AM broadcast, almost anything
will work. SSB, and weaker utility stations, a better receiver can pay
off. Not so much sensitivity, but filtering, image rejection with
larger
antennas, etc.. Often more stable too..
I've got loads of receivers, some of which I never use and forget
I even have.. IE: I've got three or four "portables", but never use
them.
But for SW/MW-BC, I could pick up any one of them, and have
no problems with a little more wire clipped to them.
But most of the reception I do is SSB, and listening to other
hams. So naturally, I usually prefer a bit better radio with
better selectivity. Some of my cheaper portables don't even
have SSB mode.. Some do though..
I've got several Drake receivers. The cheapest one being a
Drake SW-1, which does not have SSB capability.
But it's great for casual SW-BC, and MW-BC. It's S/S
and can run off 12v.
But useless for ham use, except for maybe catching a few
AMer's. For SSB use, I'd be grabbing one of my older Drakes.
Or.. maybe if I were trying to dig out some weak station
packed in between a bunch of powerhouses.
I've got a Drake 2C and 2 CQ, one of the original R4's, "0058
serial", and also a R4C. I've got one of the very first R4's built,
and one of the last.. :/ Both are pretty good radios.
My little IC-706mk2g is great for almost any kind of listening.
It's filtered tight enough for average SSB, but it's wide in
the AM mode, unless the filter is on. So the AM audio
sounds real good on it. The AM filter is actually too tight,
and almost useless so I almost never use it.
One thing I like about it, is it's general coverage and goes
up to UHF. So I can listen from LW, up through MW/SW
and on up through the air band, police bands, etc..
Makes a great scanner.
So many receivers, so little time.. Or money in some cases..
:/
You just have to decide mostly on what you want to
listen to.


Reply
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HF random wire antenna Juha Ojaniemi Antenna 2 February 17th 07 08:05 AM
random wire antenna Fred Antenna 17 November 22nd 04 06:10 PM
random wire tuner Michael Shortwave 1 August 7th 04 12:51 PM
my random wire Brian Shortwave 0 January 11th 04 03:40 AM
random wire question Brian Shortwave 11 January 8th 04 03:04 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:39 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017