Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 13, 3:01*pm, Sébastien MEDARD wrote:
We get writers here who pound the table because their magic loop in the shack is noisy and their long wire 10M away in the back yard is quiet. They have to be told to turn off the flourescent light in the shack if they want their magic loop to work. * *(Their magic loop low score on Amazon) = (stupid.) Lesson one = learned. Thanks. Sebastien. One thing handy about a small loop is you can turn it to null out the offending noise. Like Richard says, there is no magical quality which provides lower noise vs any other antenna. The real benefit is being about to turn it, usually while in the listening position. If the loop is well balanced, the nulls are quite sharp and deep and in many cases you could make that nasty noise source vanish. You can also turn it to receive multiple stations that are on the same frequency. You null the one you want to get rid of. But these type of loops are best suited for the low bands. LW, MW are where they are best suited. You get much better nulls off a ground wave signal, than you do one that is propagated via skywave. So they tend to work better at nulls in the daytime vs at night. At night, you get a mix of ground and sky wave, and the nulls are not as deep. In the day, I can make most ground wave signals totally vanish by nulling them out. These can be used in the SW bands, but don't expect the deep nulls, being as most all SW will come via sky wave. For general SWL, you are usually better off with the various wire antennas. Random wires, dipoles, etc.. But I recommend a small loop for MW if you want the ability to null noise or undesired stations. Most of mine, I build from PVC tubing for the frames. I have one in this room that is a diamond, 42 inches per side. It's on a stand which allows it to rotate, and it stands almost as tall as the ceiling. But they don't have to be that big. I've got another round one that is about 16 inches across, and it works very well too. Just a tad less signal than the big one. But the s/n ratio is much the same for the majority of the stations listened to. http://home.comcast.net/~nm5k/loop5.jpg This is my usual favored method for building a low cost MW loop. The hardest part to come by these days is the variable cap. I dig them out of old radios, and old analog tuning stereo receivers. Those are some of the best ones to use, as they often have several gangs which can be wired in parallel for more capacitance, or deleted for less. For the upper tuning ranges of the loop, it's best to delete most of the gangs, and use one of the very small ones by itself. That way you get a smaller value, and will increase the upper tuning range, vs just turning all the gangs in parallel to the minimum setting. So I use switches to do this quickly. But if you can't find any old radios to acquire the variable caps, you can buy them online from a few places. I wouldn't use one any less than a dual 365pf BC cap. You can wire the two gangs together for 730 pf. With careful loop turn design, you can usually cover the whole MW BC band with one of those. But I prefer the ones out of old stereo receivers. They are even better, and can give a wider tuning range. I think the one on my big loop has four or five gangs, some being small and useful for upper end tuning, if the other larger gangs are switched out. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|