Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Dec 21, 9:13*am, "Szczepan Bialek" wrote:
"Well, it's like this. The story starts in 1915, when mankind discovered sidebands. Now possessing this superior understanding of the AM signal, radio scientists began to understand the implications of their discovery. Soon afterwards, our old friends at Bell Labs, who have discovered practically everything, developed a method for removing one of the sidebands of an AM signal but retaining all the essential modulation components. As an expert of that day supposedly said, "both sidebands are saying the same thing" (Goodman, 1948). " From:http://www.hamradiomarket.com/articles/SSBHistory.htm I was born after 1915. I am supposing that in that time was possibility to tune to the three different frequences. Am I right? S* Only three? If the modulation is a complex signal (not just a single sinusoid), you'll get (ideally) a carrier on a single frequency, and upper and lower sidebands spanning a range of frequencies. Any decent spectrum analyzer will easily resolve these components. Communications receivers with narrow bandwidth, sharp cutoff filters can also resolve them, of course. And only "in that time"? You still can: there are plenty of AM stations broadcasting in the 0.5MHz to 30MHz range (and some outside that). But in 1915, it may well have been easier to analyze the signal mathematically than with hardware. The hardware may not have been very common, but certainly the math identities required were readily available, as was Fourier analysis. What if both sidebands are NOT "saying the same thing"? Then, for instance, you can broadcast stereo in a way that receivers mixing the two sidebands will still receive an acceptable mono signal. Cheers, Tom |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
drake CW TX sidebands? (newbie ?) | Boatanchors |