LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #5   Report Post  
Old April 10th 04, 10:08 PM
Stephen Cowell
 
Posts: n/a
Default


"Bob" wrote in message
...
Hi Steven

Thank you for your response to my problem.
Any suggestion? What you say is that I would be better off without that

1:1
balun? Yes, now I have it at 66feet each leg for a total of 132 feet but

now
it is not at the best height but kinda sagging and lopping where it is but
off the ground and about 2 feet above the roof and other obstacles. I also
have it presently close to steel guy wires and the tower itself. What

would
be my problem then here now? You believe it is my balun?


The balun is basically what is limiting your multi-band
operation. At crazy impedances the balun
prevents the shield of the coax from assisting in absorbing
some of the mismatch. Others have pointed out that the
optimum situation is to feed your antenna with balanced line...
if you must use coax, and you must have multi-band operation,
then use an antenna tuner without a balun upstairs. RG58
doesn't work nearly as good as RG8... I couldn't make my
inverted vee (resonant at 3750kHz) work 15m until I switched
over to RG8. You should avoid legal-limit operation on the
higher bands with this setup, unless you like burnt coax.

I was hoping to get
this up there and then leave it. All this climbing is difficult. Do you
believe that once I get it up there, with the coax, with the dipole, no
balun, do you think that would allow me better results with a good antenna
tuner? Any advice is greatly appreciated.


Yes, the good antenna tuner is the key. Get one
with a built-in balun, so you can try balanced feedline
when you get a chance. It really is hotter, both listening
and transmitting.

You should only climb once, put up a yardarm, rope,
and pulley, and then you can play to your heart's content.
Mounting a wire antenna permanently is pure hubris,
beware!
__
Steve
KI5YG
..




 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. Serge Stroobandt, ON4BAA Antenna 8 February 24th 11 10:22 PM
40 meter dipole or 88 feet doublet Dick Antenna 2 February 6th 04 08:55 PM
Dipole Next To Home-Is That A Problem?? Xtx99 Antenna 2 November 26th 03 12:11 AM
shortened dipole loaded Jerry Antenna 11 October 2nd 03 12:57 AM
10m dipole and tuner G. Doughty Antenna 11 September 25th 03 03:05 AM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:17 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017